To
Today's News from the U.N. and the World, visit:
MaximsNews.com Established 1999.
MaximsNews.com, News Network Reaching Over 10,000 in the
International Community, now in association
with
MediaChannel.org
and
Globalvision
News Network,
global news and media information services
with more than 300 news affiliates in 135
countries.

Skeptic
Ian Williams questions an earlier president.
Just Released,
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
:
Deserter:
George Bush's War on Military Families,
Veterans, and His Past
by Ian Williams
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as
My
Life by Bill Clinton
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375414576/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125581&camp=2321&link_code=as1
MaximsNews.com
Weekly Column
Bosnian
U.N. Defender Locked Up
by
Ian Williams
Ian
Williams
is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent for The
Nation and a weekly columnist for www.MaximsNews.com
[See his
Bio. See his columns listed below.
Ian
Williams' email:
uswarreport@igc.org
]
UNITED NATIONS --
7 July 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/ Saddam
Hussein is on trial, as is Slobodan Milosevic.
Radovan Karadzic and Ratko
Mladic, the dynamic
duo who gave the world the siege of
Sarajevo
and the slaughter of Srebrenica, are still at
large but being sought.
And the U.S.’s part in this movement for
international justice and accountability has
been to hold former Bosnian Foreign Minister Muhamed
Sacirbey for fifteen
months in a four by ten foot shared cell in a
Federal Prison in New York awaiting extradition
to Sarajevo on communist-era charges of “abuse
of powers” while he was the Bosnian Mission
to the UN.
So why would a State Department that has
expended so much diplomatic credit on keeping
entirely hypothetical U.S. citizens out of the
clutches of the International Criminal Court
be so eager to hand over an actual living U.S.
citizen like Sacirbey
to a country where the State Department’s
annual reports regularly excoriate the political
pliability of the judiciary and the danger to
inmates in its prisons.
Its
reports said of
Bosnia
and Hezegovina last
year, “The legal system was unable to protect
the rights of either victims or criminal
defendants adequately because of its inefficient
criminal procedure codes and ineffective trial
procedures.
"The
judiciary remained subject to influence by
political parties.
"Judges
and prosecutors who showed independence were
subject to intimidation, and local authorities
at times refused to carry out their
decisions.”
Understandably,
Sacirbey says his
refusal to return to
Sarajevo
to
answer charges is because of his lack of trust
in the judicial system there, especially in the
face of the political vendetta against him.
If
he were a GI awaiting extradition from, say
Iraq
,
to an air-conditioned cell in
The
Hague
under accusation of torture, the Pentagon
would be plotting a rescue mission for him!
As
it is, either spectacular incompetence, or
equally spectacular malice, are the only
explanations for the behavior of the U.S. State
Department and Justice Department, who, say
Bosnian sources, have been pressuring the judge
there to maintain the charges, to the extent of
drafting his letters to the U.S. Federal Court
to smooth over the gaping differences between
Bosnian and U.S. procedures.
The
U.S.
has also hindered attempts by prosecutors of the
International Criminal Tribunal for
Yugoslavia
to
interview Sacirbey
to help in the trial of Milosevic.
It
seems an odd way to repay the man who did so
much to help set up the Tribunal
which is now trying Milosevic.
Finally,
last Friday, on July 1 the Federal magistrate
Maas
,
embarrassed at holding someone who, as he had
said a year ago, would have been let out on bail
immediately if charged with similar offences in
a
U.S.
court, allowed bail for Sacirbey
– under punitive conditions of five million
dollars surety and house arrest in Sacirbey’s
Staten
Island
home.
He
only did so because the Prime Minister of Bosnia
over-rode the local judge in
Sarajevo
,
and wrote a letter stating that his government
had no objection to bail. The U.S. Justice
Department has opposed bail from the
beginning.
Sacirbey
was arrested last year just as the invasion of
Iraq
began, and has been held ever since under an
extradition warrant executed under a treaty
signed with the
U.S
.
in 1902 by “The Kingdom of Servia”
(sic) which the State Department
considers to be valid
with
Bosnia
&
Herzegovina
through four changes of name and political
system.
However
the Department chose not to invoke
Article 5 of this antique document, which states
baldly that neither state “shall be bound to
deliver up its own citizens,” and Sacirbey
is a
U.S
.
citizen.
In
fact, the
Sarajevo
Cantonal Court
judge has admitted that there was no indictment
in the case: the request is to interview
Sacirbey, which the
former Foreign Minister is very happy with –
if it were in the
U.S.
Sacirbey’s
legal advisor in the
U.S.
,
American
University
law professor Paul Williams, maintains that
under American law and under the extradition
treaty with “Servia,”
“There is no provision for extradition for
investigation, only when actual charges are
filed.
"The
State Department should have bounced this
right back to the Bosnians, not passed it on to
the Department of Justice,” he explains.
There
were early suspicions by Sacirbey and his family
that there were political motivations behind the
execution of the warrant, based firstly on the
timing of his arrest with the start of the war
on Iraq and strong U.S. attempts to get Bosnia
to sign up both for the “Coalition”
in the war against Iraq, and for the so-called Article
98 exemption for U.S. citizens being
extradited to the International Criminal
Court.
Indeed
State Department official, Janet Bogue,
was in
Bosnia
the same week that Sacirbey
was arrested, pressuring
Sarajevo
to
sign such a bilateral agreement.
While
the Bosnian press has rehearsed all sorts of
allegation against Sacirbey, the actual U.S.
warrant from the Southern District DA’s
office in Manhattan, which appeared to regard
“Bosnia and Herzegovina” as two separate
requesting states., says the charge is “the
crime of abuse of position or powers.”
But
what led to the charges to begin with?
In
effect Sacirbey is charged with taking money
from the UN Mission’s accounts and using it
for “unauthorized” purposes.
The
inference drawn by many in Bosnia was that he
used the money to maintain an affluent personal
life style and the Bosnian press, which often
makes the Supermarket tabloids seem like papers
of record in comparison, was happy to weigh in
with irrelevant but colourful
stories about his life style and demeanour.
Sacirbey
denies the charge.
He
says he paid out money on the Bosnian President Alija
Izetbegovic’s
orders in support of the ICTY at
The
Hague
and for the ICJ case brought by
Bosnia
against
Belgrade
for aggression and genocide.
Ironically
the person who refused to authorize this
spending was Momcilo
Krajisnik who is now
in prison at
The
Hague
for genocide.
Izetbegovic
died while Sacirbey
has been in prison.
The
Dayton
Agreement, masterminded with the same
American constitutional expertise now in
progress in
Iraq
,
brought the Bosnian’s Serbian enemies into the
office, determined to sabotage many of the
public relations and legal initiatives the Bosniaks
had previously undertaken.
People
who worked with Sacirbey
at the
Mission
during the days when he was worth several
divisions to the beleaguered Bosnians, point out
that he put in immense amounts of his own money
to start the Bosnian Mission to the U.N.
and keep it going over the years.
Ambassador
Diego Arria, who
represented
Venezuela
on
the UN Security Council when the Bosnian
war raged says “he
was fundamental in bringing the attention of the
Security Council and the international
community to the massacres and genocide going on
in his country.
"He
was an ardent and forceful advocate of human
rights and the Tribunal.
"I
never had any doubt of his integrity or
devotion.”
If
there were any substance to the accusation,
there is nothing to stop criminal charges being
laid against Sacirbey
in the
U.S.
courts.
But
no one has tried that route.
Extradition
in fact represents an Ashcroftian
black hole in the justice system on a par with
Guantanamo
.
Under
existing law, the Federal Magistrate’s
position is simply to certify that the
documentation is in order, and then to hand the
papers on to the State Department for a
political decision on whether to extradite the
prisoner – the same State Department that
began the tragicomedy originally by passing the
extradition request on to the Justice
Department!
One
almost worries about publicizing the
details in case John Ashcroft does an end run
round the Supreme Court decisions on
U.S.
citizens held as terrorists.
All
he has to do is to get an unsavory client regime
to request their extradition and pop goes habeas
corpus!
It
also highlights the peculiar ideological and totemistic
thought processes of the administration.
It
is prepared to confront all its closest allies
on the ICC, which has so many safeguards
that no sane jurist ever envisages an American
official ever facing it, but is working
assiduously to keep a real American citizen in
prison for a year and send him to a place where
he may not survive incarceration and will find
it impossible to get a fair trial.
Go
figure.
Oh,
and in case you had forgotten, where is Osama
Bin Laden?
Ian
Williams' email:
uswarreport@igc.org
Just Released:
Deserter:
George Bush's War on Military Families,
Veterans, and His Past
by Ian Williams
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
Ian
Williams' Weekly Columns in MaximsNews.com
Bosnian
U.N. Defender Locked Up 7
July 2004
The
U.N., the U.S. & the I.C.C. 30
June 2004
The
New York Times, William Safire and the
United Nations
23 June 2004
Hastily
Contrived, Verbose, and Fudged: Security Council
Resolution 1546 16
June 2004
Is
the U.S. Clever Enough to Rule the World?
9
June 2004
Humor
the Beast: the U.S. and the ICC 2
June 2004
Who’s
Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? 20
May 2004
The
Solution to the Iraqi Knot 12
May 2004
For
more information about MaximsNews.com/Books,
please see, www.maximsnews.com/bookpromotions.htm
or contact, DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com.
|