Announce Events

Send Out Your News

Sell Your Books

Advertise With Us

 

NGOs, U.N. MISSIONS: "Get Your Message Out"

 To Today's News from the U.N. and the World, visit: MaximsNews.com  Established 1999.


    MaximsNews.com, News Network Reaching Over 10,000 in the International Community, now in association with MediaChannel.org and Globalvision News Network, global news and media information services with more than 300 news affiliates in 135 countries. 

 

       

Skeptic Ian Williams questions an earlier president.

 

Where is Osama Bin Laden?

 

by Ian Williams 

Ian Williams is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent for The Nation and a weekly columnist for www.MaximsNews.com   Order his new book at the bottom of the page from Amazon.com, Deserter: George Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and His Past.   See his Bio.  See his columns listed below.   IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com 

 

          UNITED NATIONS -- 6 August 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com /   Indeed the question should be, “Who is Bin Laden?” Go on, scratch your head and see if anything comes out other than dandruff?

 Remember? He was the guy with the beard and the turban, who was on every TV screen and newspaper front page for months, usually with a “Wanted Dead or Alive” sticker on it.

The more perceptive among you may remember that he was the excuse for the less scientifically xenophobic to have a bash at innocent Sikhs, and a more creditable excuse for the invasion of Afghanistan.

More recently, he also became a large part of the excuse for the attack on Iraq. 

Night after night TV news screens emblazoned “War on Terror” paired photographs of Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, often with pictures of a blazing World Trade Center until over 70% of the American electorate thought that Saddam Hussein and Iraq were directly involved with our former Saudi chum in the September 11 attack.

Those of you with really long memories may call to mind a heroic freedom fighter against godless communist aggression in Afghanistan, but that was a long time ago, in another country, and besides, the USSR is dead.

So any vestigial memories you have of that Osama Bin Laden should be filed inaccessibly in the deepest memory hole, along with those of Saddam Hussein, our champion in the fight against the Ayatollahs and Islamic Fundamentalism.

Certainly, nothing on the television is likely to tease any such reminiscences from the depths, although occasionally there are exceptions.

If I may quote myself, (a highly reliable and named source, after all,) during one CNN talk show this April on which I was a guest, conservative pundit John Gizzi compared Bush to FDR.

I could not resist, and replied, this is  “precisely an analogy which has occurred to me. We're at a stage where, if,  after Pearl Harbor and Hitler's declaration of war on America, we had left Hitler up in the mountains in Bavaria untouched while the bulk of our armed forces were down in Argentina, kicking butt on Peron because the president didn't like him.

That's where we are. Where is Osama bin Laden? Why is Afghanistan unraveling? That's where the war on terror was. 

That's the guy that caused 9/11. Why do we have 150,000 American men and women risking their lives in Iraq where they're clearly not totally welcome, when it has nothing to do with the war on terror?”

Luckily, this was on CNN, where someone to the left of Pinochet can still speak without being barracked or cut short.

On most of what passes for discussion programs that I have been on, it has been about as fair and balanced as a bout between the Christians and the lions in the Coliseum.

The host introduces the subject with a tendentious diatribe that would not survive a minute with a fact-checker.

For example, only two weeks ago while I was on Joe Scarborough’s show he attacked the idea that the U.S. had ever supported Saddam Hussein as profoundly unpatriotic.

It is of course indisputably true that Bush senior supported Baghdad in the war on Iran, but as Pontius Pilate said as he launched a whole new brand of big cat food on a waiting Roman Empire, “What is Truth?”

The host, or ringmaster, then introduces the “Christian,” and joins the one or two conservative lions for a joint attack. 

Almost invariably, the final shot comes from the conservative pundit, which is then applauded and amplified by the host.

There are a whole host of right wing foundations who provide a salary for innumerable pundits ready at the drop of a Rolodex to display their ignorance on our screens – and it’s fun to be there to interpolate the occasional historical fact into their venting, since of course, now and again the Christians can turn on the lions and send them running – but the shows, despite the appearance of being fearless and live are usually taped -and the host controls the mikes.

So it is hardly surprising that there is indeed a proven correlation between how knowledgeable an American is about foreign affairs, and how much television they watch.

Sadly, it is an inverse correlation. Such is the power of the small screen: it actually seems to absorb information from viewers, so they become less informed the more they watch.

It is bad enough to those exposed to the words on Fox TV. 

However, we tend to underestimate the subliminal effect of those images.

Often people come to me and tell me that they have seen me on television.

 I ask “Oh, what program? What was I talking about?” 

And more often than not, they will develop a puzzled frown, and say, “I was only watching, I wasn’t listening.”

Images are very important, of course. 

So the twin images of Bin Laden and Hussein were very effective, and all those shots of President George W. Bush addressing troops and  being addressed as the commander-in-chief make the unwary think of him as a war leaders, with extensive military service in the war against terror.

The most iconic image of course is the commander-in-chief as intrepid naval aviator, bathed in the evening glow of the sun, strutting across the deck of the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in his full naval jump suit with its swelling codpiece accentuated by the cross straps of his escape harness.

Surprisingly, even some very strong Democrats confessed surprise to discover that this took place off California and not in the Gulf of the war theater.

That image lingers while only sour political commentators remember the banner “Mission Accomplished” or the White House message, some eight hundred dead GI’s ago, that major hostilities were over.

On a more mundane note, we have dissected the George Bush naval aviator collector’s doll that went on sale immediately – and it is padded, whether to enhance the size or a replica of incontinence pants, we do not know.

Of course, the president’s military record itself is highly questionable, or at least it is whenever we can find the records! 

As for his strategic prowess, please refer to the above. 

If he is fighting the war on terror, where is Osama Bin Laden?

Will there be a new October Surprise, the reverse of the kind that released the American hostages in Iran on the day of Reagan’s reelection?

Will Bin Laden suddenly be captured, days before the November 2?

Will millions of tele-screens suddenly remind millions of voters about the guy with the beard and the turban who has effectively been a non-person for eighteen months?

Hey, this is the twentieth anniversary of 1984, and Little Brother Bush has told some serious whoppers so far. 

Why should the run up to an election be any different?

     Email Ian Williams:  IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com

 

 


 

  Just Released: 

Deserter: George Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and His Past  

by Ian Williams

Order Now from Amazon.com       http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1

 

Ian Williams' Weekly Columns in MaximsNews.com

 

Where is Osama Bin Laden?  6 August 2004

Sudan, To Intervene – or not to Intervene?  27 July 2004

Mr. Sharon, Tear Down This Wall!  16 July 2004

William Safire – Warped, on Speed, or Just Running Mad Again?  13 July 2004

Bosnian U.N. Defender Locked Up  7 July 2004

The U.N., the U.S. & the I.C.C.  30 June 2004

The New York Times, William Safire and the United Nations  23 June 2004

Hastily Contrived, Verbose, and Fudged: Security Council Resolution 1546  16 June 2004

Is the U.S. Clever Enough to Rule the World?  9 June 2004

Humor the Beast: the U.S. and the ICC  2 June 2004

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf?  20 May 2004

The Solution to the Iraqi Knot  12 May 2004     

For more information about MaximsNews.com/Books, please see, www.maximsnews.com/bookpromotions.htm   or contact, DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com.

 


   Home   About Max Stamper   Key Clients   International Affairs    Media Tools  

      www.MaximsNews.com, News Network for the International Community: 

     Diplomats,  donors,  key United Nations Officials,  U.N. activists,  all Missions to the U.N.,  all NGOs,  journalists,  activists in human rights,  women's rights,  African-American rights,  peace,  the environment,  development and poverty,  public policy experts,  political figures,  and academics.  

     Syndicated globally by RSS and XML feeds, GOOGLE NEWS,  broadcast email, Blogs,  streaming video, Internet and news wire services.  For Free Subscription, RSS, or XML feeds to your website, contact: MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com


  Max Stamper, Ph.D.,  London School of Economics, and Publisher & Editor-in-Chief, MaximsNews.com,  is eager to explore your international public affairs and communication needs, and to discuss our services. DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com  phone: (+) 1 (201) 848-6162. 

Suite 112, 76 North Maple Ave. , Ridgewood, NJ  07450 U.S.A.

© Copyright 2003 -- 2004, Dr. Max Stamper & Associates.  All Rights Reserved.   

MaximsNews MaximsNews.com , Max's Maxims , DrMaxStamper.com