To
Today's News from the U.N. and the World, visit:
MaximsNews.com Established 1999.
MaximsNews.com, News Network Reaching Over 10,000 in the
International Community, now in association
with
MediaChannel.org
and
Globalvision
News Network,
global news and media information services
with more than 300 news affiliates in 135
countries.

Skeptic
Ian Williams questions an earlier president.
What
kind of Veteran? Calley-type or
Kerry-type?
by
Ian Williams
Ian
Williams
is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent for The
Nation and a weekly columnist for www.MaximsNews.com
Order
his new book from
Amazon.com, Deserter:
George
Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and
His Past.
See his
Bio. See his columns listed below.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
UNITED NATIONS --
25 August 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/
The
new ad from the so-called “Swift Boat
Veterans for Truth” may be doing Kerry a
favor – if he can bring himself to rise
to the occasion.
The
SBVFT now accuse him of slandering all
veterans because he said there were atrocities
in Vietnam, after the previous one accused him of lying to
get his medals.
Assiduous off-cable-channel reporters have shown
that the veterans’ previous statements
contradict contemporary written records, not to
mention their own previous testimonies.
The
links between the “SBVFT” and the
Bush campaign are being more obvious with each
examination.
Funders
and organizers on the ads and performers in
them, are all closely connected to the
Republican Party and the Bush campaign, and more
such links are being revealed daily.
That may in fact be why Bush has now declared
that his contender served “admirably” in
Vietnam
and tried to call a truce on the ads.
The
SBVFT ads have tried Kerry’s chivalry
to the breaking point, just as the evidence for
Bush’s involvement in them is strengthening,
and just as the question of what exactly George
W. Bush did during the war is coming to the
fore.
Hence
the measured and totally hypocritical
Presidential call for an end to all such ads
before the ones questioning his service and his
positions in the
Vietnam
years begin to cut too close to the bone.
After
all, these partisan and prejudiced veterans in
effect testify that Kerry was actually in Vietnam.
Not
even the most imaginative G.O.P. veteran has
testified to seeing Bush there.
Indeed,
there is still an unclaimed reward put up by
veterans in
Alabama
for anyone who can prove they saw the President
serving on a National Guard base there between
May 1972-73 – the missing year in his service
record.
In
his memoirs, Colin Powell spoke like a genuine
veteran, “I can never forgive a
leadership that said, in effect: These
young men – poor, less educated, less
privileged – are expendable (someone described
them as ‘economic cannon fodder’), but the
rest are too good to risk.”
He
added, inconveniently, “I am angry that so
many of the sons of the powerful and well placed
… managed to wrangle slots in Reserve and
National Guard units.
Of
the many tragedies of Vietnam, this raw class
discrimination strikes me as the most damaging
to the ideal that all Americans are created
equal and owe equal allegiance to their
country.”
So
the new attack ad also presents an
opportunity for Kerry to show some of the
gung-ho audacity that he apparently displayed in
Vietnam
and respond aggressively to this latest
ambush.
The
SBVFT have now got to the core of the
issue.
They,
and the current President supported a war that
killed some three million Vietnamese and 58,000
American troops: a war that was fought for the
wrong reasons, in the wrong place and in the
wrong way. And they still do.
Are
these people saying that U.S. forces committed
no atrocities?
Because
unlike the Weapons of Mass Destruction that
President Bush thought existed in Iraq
even as the evidence mounted that they did not,
there is plenty of evidence of war crimes in
Vietnam.
All
Kerry has to do is to recite the transcript of
the trial of Lt. William Calley for the My Lai
massacre that killed hundreds of civilians, and
ask which veteran these Republicans identify
with most closely: Lt. Calley, who was found
guilty of murdering civilians, or helicopter
pilot Warrant Officer Hugh Thompson and his door
gunner Lawrence Colburn, whom he ordered to
shoot the GI’s if necessary to stop the
killing at My Lai?
Thompson
and Colburn took thirty years to get a medal for
their genuine moral and physical courage in
confronting Calley’s C Company when it was
rampaging red in tooth and claw.
Would
the SBVFT rescind their medals?
There
was plenty of evidence from
contemporary trials, and only last year the Toledo
Blade won a well-deserved Pulitzer Prize
for its exposure of the murderous exploits of
Tiger Company.
And then Kerry can bring it forward.
He
should ask – would these “Swift Boat
veterans for Bush” prefer that the abuses
of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib had been
kept quiet?
Do
they condemn the brave soldiers in
Iraq, who like Warrant Officer Thompson showed the
special courage it takes to break the
conditioned camaraderie of the military and
invoke our common humanity and morality – not
to mention American and International Law?
And
then he can ask George W. Bush if he recognizes
the similarities between the pointless waste of
Vietnamese and American lives that he stayed out
of in the sixties – and the current imbroglio
he has got us into in Iraq.
Across
the world, the military and political leadership
of the
United States
achieved the rare feat of making the Viet Cong
and the North Vietnamese appear like angels –
which they clearly weren’t.
It
took the
United States’ moral reputation decades to begin to recover
from the stain of a war in which it dropped more
bombs on an undeveloped Third World
country than were dropped in all of World War
II.
How
long will it take the
U.S.
internally and internationally to recover from
the blot on its reputation from the war in
Iraq?
Kerry
should get away from the self-defeating cult of
the veteran, and return to his days of moral
courage, when he saw that something was wrong,
and broke with the pack to say so.
Email Ian Williams: IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Just Released:
Deserter:
George Bush's War on Military Families,
Veterans, and His Past
by Ian Williams
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
Ian
Williams' Weekly Columns in MaximsNews.com
What
kind of Veteran? Calley-type or
Kerry-type? 25
August 2004
Chavez
Beating about the Bush... 18
August 2004
The
War Records of Bush and Kerry... 12
August 2004
Where
is Osama Bin Laden? 6
August 2004
Sudan,
To Intervene – or not to Intervene? 27
July 2004
Mr.
Sharon, Tear Down This Wall! 16
July 2004
William
Safire
– Warped, on Speed, or Just Running Mad Again?
13
July 2004
Bosnian
U.N. Defender Locked Up 7
July 2004
The
U.N., the U.S. & the I.C.C.
30
June 2004
The
New York Times, William Safire and the
United Nations
23 June 2004
Hastily
Contrived, Verbose, and Fudged: Security Council
Resolution 1546 16
June 2004
Is
the U.S. Clever Enough to Rule the World?
9
June 2004
Humor
the Beast: the U.S. and the ICC 2
June 2004
Who’s
Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? 20
May 2004
The
Solution to the Iraqi Knot 12
May 2004
For
more information about MaximsNews.com/Books,
please see, www.maximsnews.com/bookpromotions.htm
or contact, DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com.
|