To
Today's News from the U.N. and the World, visit:
MaximsNews.com Established 1999.
MaximsNews.com, News Network Reaching Over 10,000 in the
International Community, now in association
with
MediaChannel.org
and
Globalvision
News Network,
global news and media information services
with more than 300 news affiliates in 135
countries.

Skeptic
Ian Williams questions an earlier president.
Chavez
Beating about the Bush...
by
Ian Williams
Ian
Williams
is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent for The
Nation and a weekly columnist for www.MaximsNews.com
Order
his new book from
Amazon.com, Deserter:
George
Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and
His Past.
See his
Bio. See his columns listed below.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
UNITED NATIONS --
18 August 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/
Quantum
physicists discuss parallel universes in a
matter of fact sort of way. In some of them,
they posit that there is a reversal of basic
properties, so there is a positron where we have
an electron, or time flows in the opposite
direction.
Looking
at events in
Venezuela
, I began to think that political scientists and
columnists should think in similar terms. Is
Bolivar’s republic on the Spanish Main a sort
of anti-universe to the
United States
?
During
this week’s referendum, it was almost like
watching through a looking glass. However, it is
not a straight reversal – more like one of
those distorting mirrors in a Carnival.
While
we are invited to distrust Hugo Chavez because
he actually served in the military, even if he
missed
Vietnam
, American presidential candidates are competing
on the basis of who is the best animated GI
figure on offer.
Chavez,
the genuine Venezuelan veteran, now wears
civilian clothes, but President Bush cannot
appear often enough in military uniform or in
front of military audiences, like the Veterans
of Foreign Wars convention he spoke at this
week.
Although
he dodged the war of his generation, went
missing during his domestic National Guard
Service, and is now running as paragon of the
military virtues, he actually evaded one foreign
war he supported, in
Vietnam
, and started another with no intention of
risking his neck there in
Iraq
.
His
chief contender John Kerry is campaigning on his
military service, while not mentioning, much,
that he returned to oppose the war in which he
had actually fought and bled.
If
you believe to the “Swift Boat Veterans for
recovered memory syndrome,” that makes less
military than the guy who dodged the war while
cheerleading from the safety of home.
And
he is running at a disadvantage because that
makes him less military than the guy who dodged
and ran.
Some
conservative commentators accused Chavez of
buying votes, as if providing work, healthcare
and education to the poorest and usually
forgotten Venezuelans was a heinous crime.
But
you can see where they come from. One of the
objections of the rich and middle class
opposition in
Venezuela
is that Chavez expects them to pay taxes.
And
not just that, he actually raised taxes to pay
down the ballooning government deficit that he
inherited from his predecessors who are now in
opposition.
In
contrast, George W. Bush has almost succeeded in
making it a constitutional amendment that
American billionaires do not pay taxes.
In
the United States, giving tax breaks to the
already rich and padding corporate welfare rolls
is, of course perfectly democratic, as is
allowing forests and national parks to be looted
and mined without any benefit to most citizens.
What
a telling contrast with a
Latin America
caudillo who is using record oil revenues to
finance welfare programs.
And
every Bush supporter knows that while other
nations’ deficits are signs of slippery
creeping socialism, impending anarchy and of
unfitness to govern, running up a deficit in
Washington
is just a legitimate cost of pork-barreling and
military adventurism.
Having
radio and TV stations owned by rich proprietors
who are rabidly reactionary and totally
uninhibited by any regard for fairness and
balance adds to the parallels, except in the
USA
anchor-people shamelessly
maintain that the President can do no
wrong, while in
Venezuela
he can do no right.
Chavez
of course seized an unfair advantage by ensuring
the registration of millions of dark colored and
poor citizens on the voting rolls, which is
clearly a threat to democracy as we know it.
This
is in no way comparable to seizing the
Presidency with a fistful of dubious votes
because your brother gerrymandered a key state
up the
Everglades
and back with ethnic cleansing of voting rolls
and selective application of balloting rules.
That
sort of behavior allows
you to preach the export of
democracy to the rest of the world.
Indeed,
one was horrified to hear that Chavez was using
his slim majority in the National Assembly to
pack the Supreme Court with politically
motivated Judges to ensure that he won any
challenges to his referendum results.
It
couldn’t happen here! We all know it is
inconceivable that five Supreme Court Justices
all appointed by previous Republican Presidents would
vote to suspend the counting of the ballots in
Florida
because to continue doing so would
“irremediably harm” the rights of one George
W. Bush, reputedly a Republican Party member.
But
Venezuela
is a banana republic, not to be measured by the
standards of civilized and developed countries.
How
can you trust a country that was the first to
abolish the death penalty, back in 1853?
It
is difficult to give whole-hearted support for
Chavez, despite amiably independent
characteristics like calling the President of
the U.S. an “a*shole,”
publicly hoping he loses the next election, and
(oh horror!) thinking current high oil prices
are “fair,” while looking to a European
social democratic model rather than an Chicago
School neo-Liberal one.
After
all, he was the leader of a military coup in
times past, and he shows a populist tendency to
assume that he represents the will of the
people, unlike Bush who was the beneficiary of a
judicial coup in 2000, and who assumes that he
represents the will of God and the people.
He
does show some authoritarian tendencies,
although nothing perhaps so draconian as the
PATRIOT Act.
And
seriously, Human Rights Watch have pointed out
that he is hardly running a Latin American
Sweden. Guns go pop in the night, and
statistically, they are more likely to pop at
the opposition than vice versa.
However,
it was Chavez who introduced the
constitutional change that allowed a recall
referendum, and he won it in the teeth of a
media that was overwhelmingly overtly partisan
against him. He has won elections and referenda
by clear majorities. In short, he is an
indisputably elected leader.
One
almost wishes that John Kerry could at least as
loudly and unequivocally promise social justice
for the millions of Americans without
healthcare, or access to proper education, or
progressive taxation on the ultra rich.
It may motivate them to turn out in the same
numbers that the marginalized Venezuelans do,
despite Fox, MSNBC and Clear Channel.
Unless we assume that the average Venezuelan is
just much smarter than the average American –
or Chavez smarter than the average American
Democratic contender.
Email Ian Williams: IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Just Released:
Deserter:
George Bush's War on Military Families,
Veterans, and His Past
by Ian Williams
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
Ian
Williams' Weekly Columns in MaximsNews.com
Chavez
Beating about the Bush... 18
August 2004
The
War Records of Bush and Kerry... 12
August 2004
Where
is Osama Bin Laden? 6
August 2004
Sudan,
To Intervene – or not to Intervene? 27
July 2004
Mr.
Sharon, Tear Down This Wall! 16
July 2004
William
Safire
– Warped, on Speed, or Just Running Mad Again?
13
July 2004
Bosnian
U.N. Defender Locked Up 7
July 2004
The
U.N., the U.S. & the I.C.C.
30
June 2004
The
New York Times, William Safire and the
United Nations
23 June 2004
Hastily
Contrived, Verbose, and Fudged: Security Council
Resolution 1546 16
June 2004
Is
the U.S. Clever Enough to Rule the World?
9
June 2004
Humor
the Beast: the U.S. and the ICC 2
June 2004
Who’s
Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? 20
May 2004
The
Solution to the Iraqi Knot 12
May 2004
For
more information about MaximsNews.com/Books,
please see, www.maximsnews.com/bookpromotions.htm
or contact, DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com.
|