But
looking at the electoral map of states that
voted against Bush suggests another, and in
some ways a more sensible option that would
save on moving costs for them.
The
West Coast and North Eastern states should
secede from the New Confederacy and join
Canada
in new Union of Provinces and States, based on
rational and democratic principles.
That
would leave the cowboy heartland and the South
to the creationist fate they deserve – which
includes the Hurricanes that either the Global
Warming that they don’t believe in, or the
God they do, is sending as a message to them.
The
election result reveals a country deeply
split, geographically and ideologically – or
rather theologically – and a people deeply
conflicted internally, since so many Bush
voters ended up casting their ballots for a
President whose actual policies on many issues
they disagree with!
The
mismatch can be seen in the victory of the
referendum in Florida to raise the minimum
wage – a plank of the Kerry campaign
nationally, but which Bush has resolutely
opposed in Washington, although as he showed
during the debates, been totally and
successfully evasive about during the
campaign.
Over
72% of Floridians voted for the raise, which
means that at least 60% of Bush voters
supported a measure that is socially and
economically the antithesis of what their
candidate stands for.
There
even seems to be some evidence that some black
religious voters, long a traditional votebank
for the Democrats may have succumbed on the
“gay marriage/evangelical” issues and
voted for a party that in some localities is
the direct descendant of the Dixiecrats and
the Klan.
It
was a triumph of the Bush campaign to do that
while still successfully evoking the coded
racism that has been so successful for it
across the country.
In
fact, the polls from the
University
of
Maryland
showed that the Bush campaign had actually
concealed much its real political and economic
agenda from its supporters, who actually came
out to the left of Kerry on many issues!
But
the key issue was security and terrorism,
where the War on Iraq, and, as so many of them
still believe, the War on Terror of which it
is part, motivated Bush voters whose views on
these matters were as faith based as so much
of their voting.
As
that poll showed, over seventy per cent of
Bush supporters believed that weapons of mass
destruction had been found, and that Saddam
Hussein was behind September 11.
Indeed,
it seems that many of them, confusing
militarism with military experience, thought
that Bush was a better Commander-in-Chief,
despite his evasions and desertions during the
Vietnam War, than Kerry, a bemedalled veteran.
So
what are the consequences, apart from renewed
scrutiny of the Constitution’s creakily
democratic processes?
Slightly
more likely than the union with Canada is that
the Republican Party, under the renewed
control of the deeply conservative ideologues
marches down the dead-end charted by the
British Conservative Party and reduces itself
to an unelectable rump by shedding the saner
and more tolerant Republicans, like Pataki in
New York and Schwarzenegger in California,
whose politics are not as right wing as the
Bible Belt would wish.
On
the brighter side still, despite the appalling
levels of voter ignorance, even though this
was the most expensive election in history,
with more spent on the Presidential campaigns,
over $4 billion, than some small countries’
GDPs, it also had more popular participation
than ever before.
Set
rolling by Howard Dean’s grassroots
campaign, volunteers went to work on the
Democratic campaign on a scale unprecedented
for many decades, not least since Bill Clinton
and the DLC turned it into a PO Box address
for corporate contributions.
From
safer states like
New York
and
Massachusetts
thousands of volunteers had taken weeks off
work to get out the vote in swing states like
Pennsylvania
, where, incidentally, a core of British Labor
and
Union
volunteers defied Tony Blair to go and canvass
for Kerry.
That
flood of volunteers, voter registrations, and,
by American standards, high turnout led to
great Democratic optimism.
However,
unremarked by them, the evangelical voters
were also turning out in large numbers.
They
were motivated, in part, by state referenda
seeking to ban gay marriages, and by the
abortion issue, one of those peculiarly
American touchstone issues that drives away
all rational considerations of war and peace,
prosperity and poverty.
However,
while most Kerry supporters were clear what
they were voting against,
the Kerry campaign was much less clear in
showing voters what they would be voting for.
The
Bush campaign successfully fudged these
issues, just as the Kerry campaign failed to
articulate them convincingly, even though it
was indeed an uphill struggle against the
constant intellectual erosion of overtly
partisan news and talk shows from Tony
Blair’s friend Rupert Murdoch and
similar-minded media moguls.
Let
us hope that finally, heartened by the
unprecedented mobilization on behalf of the
Kerry Edwards ticket, the Democratic Party may
escape from being a bran-tub of special
interests and minorities and begin to develop
an agenda that can appeal across the board.
At
present, so many blue collar workers whose
wages are frozen, who face export of their
jobs abroad, and whose unemployment benefits
are about to disappear, continue to abhor the
Democrats as the party of abortion and gay
marriage.
If
the Democrats cannot frame a platform that
appeals to those voters, then there is little
hope for the Democratic Party– or for the
US
for that matter.
It
is not a matter of Clintonian triangulation.
The record vote for Democratic (and liberal)
Senator Russ Feingold in
Wisconsin
shows that having strong principles can win
elections.
The
Democrats should pick their leader now,
whether it is John Kerry or someone else, and
learn how to be an effective opposition while
beginning the 2008 campaign now.
And
in the meantime, the rest of the world has
just got to get down and begin to work out how
to carry on together without the constructive
input of the world’s strongest military
power.