|
UNITED NATIONS --
1 December 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/ The Ancient Mariner is at it
again. The first hint of a full moon
and there is William Safire with his
glittering eye and skinny hand tapping out
his New York Times column,
obsessing about Kofi Annan, who he depicts
as a diabolical synthesis of Darth Vader
and Al Capone.
“There
are still officials of the oil-stained
U.N. Secretariat who profess to believe
the repeated denials of Benon Sevan, the
longtime right-hand man of Kofi Annan put
in charge of what became history's largest
swindle” he foamed at his key board.
Sadly,
instead of following Coleridge’s
script, “Hold off! unhand me, grey-beard
loon !” the New York Times
validates his droolings by carrying it. I
am not a fan of British libel laws, but
they do teach our profession some residual
respect for fact-checking.
I
rather suspect that if Benon Sevan, the
former head of the Oil For Food program
lived in
London
, and William Safire’s column appeared
in the International Herald Tribune,
that Sevan could make much more money from
a libel case than he is alleged to have
made in one scrap of hitherto unexamined
paper from dubious sources from
Iraq
.
Indeed,
if we look at the fate of Dan Rather,
burnt at the stake for not establishing
the full provenance of a scrap of paper
about Bush’s national guard career, even
though he validated its actual contents
with a human source, one has to wonder at
the double standards.
Safire
ends his column, “This marks the end of
the beginning of the scandal. Its end will
not begin until Kofi Annan, even if
personally innocent, resigns - having,
through initial ineptitude and final
obstructionism, brought dishonor on the
Secretariat of the United Nations.”
In
fact, I think we should have a poll.
Should the New York Times fire
William Safire sooner than his announced
departure date? Or should they just set
the fact checkers on him and hope that
that will frighten him off?
“History’s
biggest swindle,” he alleges. Bigger
than Enron? Bigger than Halliburton?
Bigger than the Savings and Loan Scandal?
Apparently,
an adult son not telling you all his
business details makes you unfit to hold
high office.
Yeah,
just like Safire called for Bush
senior’s resignation when his offspring
was neck-deep in the Savings and Loans
affair.
Or
for the resignation of Cheney, the former
CEO of Halliburton, because of the real
scandals surrounding it. But then all of
these real, and really big rip-offs were
conducted by chums of the grey-bearded
loon!
So
is there an Oil For Food
“Scandal?”
Yes,
indeed, there are. Let us begin with the
nine billion dollars from the Oil
For Food program that were handed over
to Bremer and were promptly passed on to
Halliburton in bid-free contracts as far
as we can tell, since no one is
cooperating with the audit.
It
is a scandal that none of these
editorialists has called for an inquiry
into those real missing billions.
It
is a scandal that Kofi Annan has been
harried into running an expensive thirty
million dollar two year long inquiry into
how stormy it can get in a tea cup.
It
is a scandal that when Annan picks a
respected, indeed revered, figure in the
financial world, Paul Volcker, to conduct
the inquiry they had demanded, the rabid
Neo Con hordes then start maligning his
integrity too – while attacking Annan
for setting up the inquiry.
It
is a scandal that the likes of Safire now
shed crocodile tears about entirely
hypothetical lives lost in
Iraq
because of diverted money while they snap
their fanged jaws in delight at
untold thousands of Iraqi civilians they
have killed with their war – not to
mention the thousand plus Americans whose
blood should be on their hands as well.
It
is a scandal that they all supported
sanctions when they were directly
responsible for killing hundreds of
thousands of Iraqi children, remember
Madeleine Albright –“a price worth
paying.”
It
is a scandal that Safire and Co. supported
the first Bush administration when it gave
moral support, material aid and diplomatic
cover to Saddam Hussein, as he used poison
gas on the Kurds and waged a war of
aggression on
Iran
.
It
is a scandal that we do not hear that
Halliburton subsidiaries, when Cheney was
running the company, were bidding
successfully for Oil For Food
Contracts.
It
is a scandal that so-called journalists
happily elide the money that Saddam got
from selling oil to
Turkey
and
Jordan
– with
Washington
’s blessing, and lay it at the door of
the UN.
It
is a scandal that the Security Council
Sanctions Committee, did not take action
on information about the percentages that
Iraq
was charging – when the Oil For
Food officials informed them about it.
What
Safire and his pals have done, relatively
unchallenged even by the saner media,
is to lay every dime and dinar that
Saddam made from the first to the Second
Gulf Wars at the door of the United
Nations.
The
sums allegedly involved keep ballooning
like the Federal Deficit. The GAO said ten
billions, but admitted that half of that
had nothing to do with the UN at all, no
matter how tenuously. Fox yelped about the
ten billion and overlooked the GAO’s
fine print.
Safire
says twenty billion. Joe Scarborough on
MSNBC says a hundred billion – which is
more than the entire value of the oil
piped out under the program!
And
here we come to the nub of the
“scandal.” It was begun by deranged
and disgruntled NeoCons who could not
accept that the UN, far from being dead,
was where the White House wanted to pass
the buck for the Iraqi fiasco.
They
began the campaign to undermine Lakhdar
Brahimi’s efforts to end the occupation,
and then it got legs of its own. Henry
Hyde, someone on the record as wanting the
US
to leave the UN, suddenly discovered a
concern for its reputation.
All
the Neanderthalers who had been at a loss
since Jesse Helms took his own Klannish
form of isolationism out of the Senate
have rallied to the banner. And now they
will not forgive Kofi Annan for telling,
no matter how politely, the honest truth.
The invasion of
Iraq
was against the UN Charter.
If
you look, the White House has been silent
on this. In fact, I was on a Fox TV show
with White House spokesman Dan Bartlett
just before the election where he was
actually trying to pour oil on the
disturbed waters.
The
bad news is that the dark forces who
initiated this campaign look like they
will be in the ascendancy in the new Bush
White House.
In
fact, you only have to contrast the NeoCon
bayings on Cable TV and in the editorial
pages of the Wall Street Journal
with the serious, sourced investigations
in the news pages of the Journal,
and other newspapers that still have fact
checkers.
But
their silence is letting the mud stick. Of
course lots of people want Annan to
resign. He is African and uppity. He does
not do what he is told. He thinks that the
other 190 members of the UN and their
governments should have some say in the
organization.
So,
let’s get some parity here. Why should
we only call on the New York Times
to fire Safire? Let’s get the real
albatross off the world’s collective
neck.
Where
are the editorials calling for the
resignation of Bush and all his cabinet
for lying us into a 200 billion dollars,
one hundred thousand dead war?
Email Ian Williams: IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
New:
Argue/Agree
with the Author.
Write
a Letter to the Editor!! www.MaximsNews.com/LetterstoEditor
!!!
|