|

Skeptic
Ian Williams questions an earlier president.
|
MaximsNews.com
Columnist
KIM
JONG IL WANTS A VOTE FOR THE INCUMBENT
TOO!
by
Ian Williams
|

Ian
Williams
is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent for The
Nation and a weekly columnist for www.MaximsNews.com.
Order
his great book from
Amazon.com, Deserter:
George
Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and
His Past.
Ian Williams is the past president of the United
Nations Correspondents Association. See his
Bio.
See his columns listed below.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
UNITED NATIONS -- 28 October 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/ Faced with a visibly
intellectually-challenged incumbent who has run
up the biggest deficit in history, and who is
running a disastrous foreign war based on what
are now admitted falsehoods, John Kerry should
win by a landslide but it is still too close
to call, even discounting the paranoid thought
that George W. Bush may suddenly produce Osama
Bin Laden from his hat on Halloween.
Some
of this is a self-inflicted wound.
Kerry,
like most American politicians, has spent so
much time pandering to the lobbyists and special
interest groups who pay for elections that the
accusations of flip-flopping have some
truth.
Bill
Clinton called it triangulation, but the
Arkansas wonder had a tremendous charisma that
allowed him to leave office as the most popular
president in recent history.
Indeed,
one reason for hope for Kerry is that Bill
Clinton is back up from his heart surgery and
resumes campaigning this week, which in such a
close race should help close the yawning
charisma gap.
Ironically,
Bush’s constant abuse of Kerry as a
“Liberal” during the recent debates may help
the Democrat, since many voters who need
motivating think that the Senator is far too
conservative!
Certainly
many liberals may well wonder why they
will bother to vote for someone who forswears
signing the Kyoto Protocols, promises that he
won’t be “giving a veto to the UN” and who
along with John Edwards strongly hints that
Bush really fluffed it because he went after
Iraq, instead of Iran.
Indeed,
speaking at a Rally at the British Labour Party
conference a few weeks ago, I had to remind them
that, despite their ire at Blair for chumming up
to Bush, the Democratic contender’s stated
positions on most items of US policy make
British Tory leader Howard and Italian Premier
Berlusconi look like raging leftists.
Even
so, any Americans in full possession of their
marbles have to be supporting Kerry –:Bush, is
far worse, and a real threat to the US and to
the world.
One
of those threats is to democracy – which even
at the best of times is not as the rest of the
world knows it in the USA, which still has an
essentially 18th century
polity.
Compared
with Europe, being on the electoral rolls in the
USA often takes a lot of effort, and the
Southern Democrats in the past, and the
Republicans who have spiritually inherited their
Ku Klux Klan robes, have centuries of experience
in keeping unreliable voters off the rolls.
It
is true that the fossilized American two party
system is undemocratic.
But
when Naderites ask us to help break it, we
should not do it this year when it shows ominous
signs of breaking into a one party system.
Republicans
speak openly about vote suppression.
The
Ohio Republican Party has just enlisted 3,600
volunteers whose job is essentially to challenge
the right to vote of many Democratic voters –
and to scare off many others.
Another
Republican state official has rejected voter
registration forms that came in on
insufficiently heavy paper.
In
Florida, one of Jeb Bush’s hirelings has
rejected registration forms where the would-be
voters signed declarations that they were
citizens – but did not tick a box saying the
same thing.
In
Florida, notoriously, thousands of black voters
who have the same names as felons elsewhere in
the country have been dropped, yet again, from
the voting register, but the same mistake was
not made for Hispanic votes.
It
is not of course because Cuban Americans are
especially law-abiding – on the contrary -but
they have traditionally supported Republicans.
Today,
it is reported that 60,000 blank absentee
ballots in Broward County, Florida seem to be
lost in the mail.
Some
states are accepting faxed absentee ballots from
the military, negating the struggle for secret
ballots that is the foundation of democracy.
In
the old days, the Supreme Court took an interest
in such vote suppression tactics, but that was a
different Court – not the one that stopped the
recount in Florida and declared Bush the winner
four years ago.
Indeed,
that is one of the major reasons why democratic
(with a small “d”) Americans should want a
Kerry victory.
The
Supreme Court already has a Republican inclined
majority, and Bush, if "re-elected",
would almost certainly appoint sufficient
conservatives to consolidate that hold for
decades.
He
already has to all the lower positions, where
finding a recently appointed Federal Judge who
supports Roe v. Wade is as likely as finding an
overt Trotskyist on Stalin’s Central
Committee.
A
consolidated right wing Supreme Court Bench
could, and almost certainly would, frustrate any
future Democratic attempts to legislate out of
the genuine social, economic and military crises
that George W. Bush has dragged the country
into.
It
would certainly back gerrymandering exercises
like the recent one in Texas that wrote off the
map five Democratic Congressional Districts.
With
such stark issues confronting the country, one
has to ask white, working class voters behave
like Turkeys voting for Christmas and support
Bush and the Republicans?
The
answers were revealed last week in a poll
conducted by the University of Maryland.
The
majority of Bush supporters actually still think
that Saddam Hussein was behind September 11, and
three quarters of them think that Iraq was
providing substantial support for
Al-Qaeda.
Weeks
after the official Duelfer report that Iraq had
no weapons of mass destruction, 72% of them
think that it did.
Indeed
57% thought that the Report actually said so.
Interestingly,
a majority of the Bush supporters also said that
they would not have supported the War if there
were no WMDs.
Most
Bush supporters obviously listen to Tony Blair
as well – they think the rest of the world
wants Bush re-elected.
On
more domestic issues, most Bush voters think
that he supports the International Criminal
Court, and three quarters actually assume that
he favors including labor and environmental
standards in trade agreements.
In
short – most Bush supporters support Kerry’s
policies, not Bush’s!
Indeed
they may even be to the left of Kerry!
The
corollary to that is that Kerry has not been
getting his message out clearly.
And
in fact, he has hedged far too much.
But
it also speaks to the nature of political
discourse in the country.
Most
Americans get their news from TV and
radio.
Since
deregulation of the media, and the consolidation
of media ownership, there has been far less of
it – and what there is has an unashamed
rightward slant.
Even
Republican legislators recently turned back an
attempt by the Federal Communications Commission
to remove some the last bars on cross holdings
of print and broadcast media.
That
would probably be successful in a second term.
Add
to that the role of money in politics, which
reduces political discourse to brain-numbing and
slanderous but highly expensive sound-bite ads
backed by “fair and balanced” bigoted big
mouths masquerading as journalists, and you
almost have to admire Americans for not
returning majorities of Kim Jong Il proportions
to the incumbent.
But
it seems that on November 2, we may have to hope
that the Democrats can hire better lawyers and
rent-a-mobs than the Republicans.
Let’s
hope that Kerry gets elected – so we can start
holding his feet to the fire.
At
least he will feel it – his opponent obviously
does not notice when his pants are in
conflagration.
Email Ian Williams: IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Order Here!!!
Deserter:
George Bush's War on Military Families,
Veterans, and His Past
by Ian Williams
Order
Now from
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560256273/wwwmaximsnewc-20/103-2632401-6943852?creative=125577&camp=2321&link_code=as1
Ian
Williams' Weekly Columns in MaximsNews.com
KIM
JONG IL Wants a Vote for the Incumbent Too!
28
October 2004
President
Bush and the Three Little Pigs... 13
October 2004
When
Hypocrisy Can Kill... 7
October 2004
Bush
- Still A Deserter Safire, still wrong...
15
September 2004
Bushowulf
– the Saga 10
September 2004
Why
Lebanon?... 9
September 2004
Ian
Williams Welcomes Republicans to New York...
29 August 2004
What
kind of Veteran? Calley-type or
Kerry-type? 25
August 2004
Chavez
Beating about the Bush... 18
August 2004
The
War Records of Bush and Kerry... 12
August 2004
Where
is Osama Bin Laden? 6
August 2004
Sudan,
To Intervene – or not to Intervene? 27
July 2004
Mr.
Sharon, Tear Down This Wall! 16
July 2004
William
Safire
– Warped, on Speed, or Just Running Mad Again?
13
July 2004
Bosnian
U.N. Defender Locked Up 7
July 2004
The
U.N., the U.S. & the I.C.C.
30
June 2004
The
New York Times, William Safire and the
United Nations
23 June 2004
Hastily
Contrived, Verbose, and Fudged: Security Council
Resolution 1546 16
June 2004
Is
the U.S. Clever Enough to Rule the World?
9
June 2004
Humor
the Beast: the U.S. and the ICC 2
June 2004
Who’s
Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf? 20
May 2004
The
Solution to the Iraqi Knot 12
May 2004
For
more information about MaximsNews.com/Books,
please see, www.maximsnews.com/bookpromotions.htm
or contact, DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com.
Please
CONFIRM your free Subscription
to MaximsNews.com: See the Bottom of
this Page.*
|