MaximsNews.com U.N. ® LLC News for the United Nations and the International Community - Established 1999
UNITED NATIONS - / www.MaximsNews.com
UN/ - 9 September 2006 -- One is by the first incumbent of this position, Trygve Lie of Norway, who famously called it "the most impossible job in the world". The
other is by the first, and so far only, Asian SG - U Thant
of It would be all too facile and fallacious to draw conclusions from this contrast. It is not a question of hardheaded Western pragmatism versus philosophical Eastern equanimity. Both men worked at the UN during the Cold War era. Trygve Lie was forced to resign because of Soviet
antagonism while U Thant declined unanimous offers of a
third term. Was it because U Thant was content to be more
Secretary than General or was he a more consummate
diplomat harmonizing the competing interests of the two
super-powers of the time? Today, times have changed. The Cold war is over. Yet we do have the countervailing imperatives of a unipolar world on the one hand, with one super power possessing an accumulation of military, political, economic and 'soft' power on a global scale that is unprecedented in human history. On the other hand, we have a globalized world of rising expectations in a highly integrated political and economic world order where multilateralism is an indispensable foreign policy option for the mighty and the meek and for the rich and the poor. At the apex of this multilateral system is the 61 year old United Nations politically paralyzed when the Permanent Five of the Security Council (P5) disagree - as in the case of Iraq in 2003 - but remarkably effective when they do agree. Based on
universally shared values the UN has set and monitored the
implementation of norms in a wide range of fields from
human rights to international trade. It has been at the
forefront in peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance,
development policy and many other areas affecting the
daily lives of people. So how important is the choice of the next SG of this world body that everybody wants to reform? Some loudly lament the absence of a formal job description. Do we make the incumbent more effective by spelling out his complex duties? How many incompetent Presidents or unpopular Prime Ministers would have performed better if their written or unwritten constitutions had fleshed out their functions? Do the times determine the job or does the jobholder influence the manner in which the duties are discharged? What qualifications and experience are we looking for or is it, as one veteran UN observer has recently written, mainly a matter of "character and potential"?
And if so how do you judge that? By common consent no one
has enlarged the scope and stature of the job as much as
Dag Hammarskjold (1953-61) did. Was his exemplary
character pre-judged? Succeeding him, U Thant (1961-71)
brought the UN into calmer waters despite the Vietnam War
focussing on what the UN can do rather on what it could
not. Was it foreseen that he would be the SG that he
turned out to be? Then
there is the procedure for the election on which many
views have been expressed. Should it be more transparent
and should not the General Assembly have more control?
Should the candidates present manicured manifestos and
engage in a U.S.
Presidential campaign style extravaganza or should they be
shrinking violets waiting coyly in the wings till the call
comes? All pertinent questions. Today, those disillusioned by the sullied reputation of the UN seek a Superman as the next SG. The media speculates wildly about past Presidents and current Prime Ministers forgetting that those elected on national mandates are more likely to be Generals than Secretaries. The UN system has already had many such square pegs in round holes. Perhaps what the UN needs today is what it has always needed - a SG who is a tried and tested diplomat with versatility and gravitas derived from experience, a flexible and modest temperament and the limitless patience of a consensus builder. We need someone who will be more of a steady moral compass than a flamboyant political weathercock. History has proved that
the Charter's Article 100 requirement for impartiality is
more achievable with the citizens of smaller countries
with the least amount of accompanied national baggage of
territorial and other disputes in their international
relations. We need a strong manager who will delegate and
yet be finally the person where the buck stops. And yes -
even if it is an oxymoron - we need a practical idealist. The limitations of the job are well known. 192 sovereign states are unlikely to yield more power or latitude to the office of the SG. Nor will the Security Council be pursuaded to act speedily however often and urgently the SG draws their attention to situations threatening international peace and security under Article 99.
Resources will remain unpredictable and limited. Smooth
relations with the host country and largest contributor to
the Budget are a sine qua non. The SG will remain the
lightning conductor when things go wrong whether it is
because of what the Security Council, General Assembly or
some other part of the complex UN system did or did not
do. The choice will be made in a few weeks. Already some transparency in the process is evident as candidates are scrutinized by civil society and the media. And yet doubts remain about the process. Will new candidates enter the race dodging critical appraisal? Will the choice be made on the basis of realpolitik among the P 5? Will bilateral relations and the propensity for building strategic partnerships, enhanced economic investment, aid and trade between the voter country and the voted individual's state be the criteria? Or will it be confined to the record of
achievements and proven abilities of the candidates? Only
time will tell. ~~~ MaximsNews.com, An Independent Voice from the U.N., provides commentary and analysis from leading world figures: King Abdullah II (Jordan), HRH Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein, Sir Brian Urquhart, Hans Blix, Amb. Richard Holbrooke, Anwar Ibrahim, Bianca Jagger, Shashi Tharoor, Kerry Kennedy, Ian Williams, Stephen Schlesinger, Sen. Timothy E. Wirth, Marc Morial, Barbara Crossette, Amb. Jayantha Dhanapala, Amb. Pierre Schori (Sweden), Amb. William H. Luers, Mehri Madarshahi, Gloria Feldt, Jeffrey Laurenti, Rodney D. Smith, Rory O'Connor, Genevieve Stamper, Max Stamper and others.
|
|||||||||||||||
