 |
| ECOSOC President Marjatta
Rasi
(U.N. Photo) |
UNITED
NATIONS — 10 March 2004 -- In 1945, two important councils of
nations were created at the heart of the United Nations.
The
Security Council, charged with keeping the peace, has rarely been out of the
limelight since — certainly not in the last 10 or 15 years.
However,
its twin, the Economic and Social Council, known as ECOSOC, sank
into obscurity over the decades, upstaged not only by the Security Council
but also the General Assembly and a host of agencies and programs working
on what should have been primarily ECOSOC's issues: development,
health and human rights.
Those
Americans who are perennially outraged by events around the United Nations are
more often than not shocked by decisions made by ECOSOC's commissions or
committees — on human rights, women's rights, sustainable
development and such — or annoyed with the council's control over
nongovernmental organizations' access to U.N. conferences.
For
many outsiders, the conduct of ECOSOC, where blocs of nations can gang up
to prevent effective action on a range of subjects, is the epitome of
international politicking gone wildly awry.
Presidents
of ECOSOC, chosen annually by its 54 member nations, come and go, often
arriving with high hopes and leaving with frustrations.
This
year, a president with exceptional qualifications holds the chair, and she — the
first woman elected to the post — has some innovative ideas about
revitalizing the council.
The
new president, Ambassador Marjatta Rasi of Finland, was her country's director
general for international development cooperation and humanitarian assistance
before being assigned to New York as ambassador four years ago.
A
career diplomat, she had also been ambassador to India, where she picked up
valuable development experience in the field.
As
head of Finland's mission in New York, she became known for her businesslike
manner and boundless curiosity about all phases of U.N. life.
In
an interview in her mission office, a showcase of Finnish contemporary
design, she said that like other European diplomats (and others) she believes
that reforming the United Nations means much more than just reconfiguring the Security
Council, the focus of most current attention because of its central role in
the battle over how to proceed in Iraq.
All
the component parts need attention, she says.
What
went wrong with ECOSOC? Is it numbers? The council grew from
18 members in 1945 to 27 in 1965 and 54 in 1973.
"Some of our colleagues argue that it's too big, because if you are 15 or
maybe even 20-plus, you could have serious discussions and negotiations," Rasi
said.
"On
the other hand, there are many member states who consider ECOSOC too
small because they believe that all these matters, the economic issues, should
be discussed in the General Assembly, and all member states should be
part of these very, very important discussions."
Unlike
many of her predecessors as ECOSOC president, however, she doesn't narrow
her efforts on her office alone.
Sharing
Secretary General Kofi Annan's perception that what is needed are fewer fiefdoms
and more interaction in the organization, she wants to bring ECOSOC back
into the loop by forging links with her counterparts in the General Assembly,
whose president is also elected annually, and the Security Council, where
the presidency rotates month by month.
"I
would like to have very serious discussions with the president of the General
Assembly and the Security Council," Rasi said.
"Why
is it that we can't have more cooperation?
We all emphasize that we all must work in coherence. But when it comes to
the issues, then it's difficult.
Like
today, Haiti is very much on the agenda.
ECOSOC
has been dealing with Haiti, as has the General Assembly and the Security
Council, and now it seems to be on everybody's agenda.
We
should very carefully coordinate when, or if, the time comes [that] the U.N. is
required to do something in Haiti."
Rasi
also wants to plug ECOSOC into the work of the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization and other U.N. bodies
working in economic development.
"ECOSOC,
unfortunately, has always been looked down on a little bit," she said.
"If you read the U.N. Charter, it's a very important U.N. body but somehow
its relevance doesn't match."
Critics would say that is because the council marginalized itself under the
influence, on one hand, of a group of developing nations opposed to the leading
industrial countries and the policies they promoted.
On
the other hand, the United States has occasionally aligned itself with
conservative Islamic governments and the Vatican to slow movement on issues such
as women's rights or AIDS education.
Few
nations are blameless here.
Arid
stalemate and growing irrelevance are the result.
ECOSOC's
issues get taken over by others at a time when the overworked Security Council
should be sending some problems to ECOSOC instead.
"One
role we are at least starting to do well is our cooperation with the Bretton
Woods institutions," Rasi said, referring to the World Bank and IMF.
That
new cooperation includes consultations on how to achieve the Millennium
Development Goals to reduce poverty, set at a U.N. summit in 2000, and how
to get action on a plan for financing development proposed at another summit in
Monterrey, Mexico, in 2002.
An
annual spring ECOSOC meeting now takes place with the Bretton Woods
institutions and WTO.
"It has become quite an important event," she said.
Rasi
hopes to bring the same coherence to what some would call the runaway ECOSOC
commissions by instituting regular meetings between her office and the various
commission heads and getting them all to think together about concrete ways to
deal with the social and economic problems that can lead to civil wars and
terrorism.
In
July, the ministerial-level meeting of ECOSOC will be built around the
needs of the least developed countries.
"We
all know that more than 70 percent of the U.N.'s work is social or
economic," she said.
"But
media, for some reason, is only interested in Iraq, and the Middle East.
"So
this kind of work is mainly invisible work.
"When
you talk about Millennium Development Goals or the Monterrey
consensus it's not very dramatic or media attractive.