MaximsNews.com Columnist
Ambassador
Pierre Schori of Sweden and U.N. Secretary-General
Kofi Annan. Amb.
Schori, currently a Visiting Professor at Adelphi
University,
New York, was Sweden’s ambassador
to the United Nations from September 2000
to September 2004.

Wars
and Elections Seen From My Classroom
By Ambassador Pierre
Schori
Amb.PierreSchori@MaximsNews.com
UNITED NATIONS -- 27 October 2004 / www.MaximsNews.com
/ The
Adelphi campus on Long Island is warming
up to the elections.
No
one of its 8,000 students, including more
than a hundred from overseas, has been
able to ignore the buzz outside and inside
class rooms and other University
facilities.
Debates
are arranged between Young Democrats and
Republicans, faculty encourages
discussions and an energetic voter
registration action, V.O.T.E.R. (Voicing
Our Thoughts, Exercising our Rights) has
been started by students.
In
my own Freshman class, on Human Rights, we
have tried to find some answers to the
questions of war and peace and political
leadership.
We have tried to go beyond the campaign
that sometimes reminds me of Cardinal
Richelieu’s words:
“Give me six lines written by the hand
of the most honest of men, I will find
something in them which will hang him.”
Studying
the history of human rights we have
discovered that not much is new under the
sun, and that the powers of today would be
wise to learn from the past.
In
our texts, we have found how the
philosopher Plato, 2600 years ago, not
only argued for equal rights for women but
also for respectful treatment of enemy
soldiers:
"Treat
our enemies as the Greeks now treat each
other and never ravage their land nor burn
their houses”.
We
have read how the Magna Charta came about
in England, in 1215, as a protest against
war against Muslims in foreign land.
The
need for heavy taxation to finance the
Third Crusade prompted the call for more
civil rights.
Four
hundred years later, Hugo
Grotius of Holland, in his “Laws of War
and Peace”, wrote “when arms have once
been taken up there is no longer any
respect for law, divine or human; it is as
if frenzy had openly been set loose for
the committing of all crimes”.
Grotius
also defined the right to self- defense,
but in a restrictive sense:
“No
other just cause for undertaking of war
can there be excepting injury received”.
We
applied this information to current events
and concluded that, after September 11,
the United States, supported by people all
over the world and the UN Security Council
and General Assembly, made use of the
recognized right of self-defense against
Al Qaeda and the Taliban regime.
We
also saw the war in Afghanistan as a
legitimate action in response to what
Grotius called “injury received”.
But
the war on Iraq was different.
Most
people in the world saw Saddam Hussein’s
regime as a despicable dictatorship but
hardly as a powerful state, subjected as
it was to severe sanctions, fly-free
zones, the oil-for-food program and the
most intrusive foreign inspections program
ever in the history of the United Nations.
Hussein
was “in the box”, as Madeleine
Albright put it, and not an imminent
threat.
This
view was also reflected in the conclusions
of the September 11 Commission: there were
no weapons of mass destruction and there
is no credible evidence that Iraq and al
Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the
United States.
Therefore
it was difficult to see the war on Iraq as
a preemptive strike and not as a
conventional attack on a sovereign state.
Instead
of defeating terrorism at its roots, are
we now seeing “a
new Afghanistan inside Iraq” being
created, as Francis Fukuyama put it
recently.
Last week’s
elections in the Eastern part of Germany
showed strong support for far-right
parties and former Communists.
The reason for
this was, according to a German political
scientist, “a mixture of social rage,
and the abuse of this rage by extreme
groups” (NYT, 9/20).
We can only
imagine what the level of social rage is
in countries whose people live without
hope, in extreme poverty and exclusion, as
the case is in the Middle East.
On September 21, at
the United Nations, Spain’ s new Prime
Minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero,
gave a thoughtful speech, sadly totally
ignored by US media.
He said:
“Terrorism is
insanity and death. From thirty years of
terrorism Spanish women and men have
learned that the risk of a terrorist
victory rises sharply when, in order to
fight terror, democracy betrays its
fundamental nature, governments curtail
civil liberties, put judicial guaranties
at risk, or carry out pre-emptive military
operations. This is what our people have
learned: that it is legality, democracy
and political means and ways what make us
stronger and them weaker”.
He went on to say:
“The seed of evil
cannot take root when it falls on the rock
of justice, well-being, freedom and hope;
but it can take root if it lands on the
soil of injustice, poverty, humiliation
and despair.”
Are we listening?
According to the
president of the World Bank, Jim
Wolfensohn, the world spends more than 900
billion dollars on military expenditure,
300 billion on the world´s richest
farmers in agricultural subsidies and
allocates only 56 billion to foreign aid.
“It
is the weakness of our enemies that is the
threat today, not their strengths”,
Nancy Birdsall, of the Center for Global
Development, warned last June in Washington when she presented the report
“On the Brink: Weak States and U.S.
National Security”.
It
is vital that international terrorism is
confronted and ultimately defeated.
The
UN acted quickly and resolutely after
September 11 in solidarity with the U.S.
and to create international laws against
terrorist individuals and networks,
including their financial resources.
The
world was united on September 11,
2001.
This
September both the USA and the world are
divided.
We
must and we can find that unity again, to
fight terrorism and its root
causes.
In
this effort all democratic nations and
their citizen must join forces, with the
UN playing a central role.
Ambassador
Jean PIERRE Olov SCHORI
Amb.PierreSchori@MaximsNews.com
Born
in Norrköping, Sweden, in 1938.
His
mother was Swedish and his father Swiss
Married
to Maud EDGREN-SCHORI,
M.A.S.W,
Licentiate of Philosophy in Social Work,
Stockholm University
Mr.
Schori has three children
Education
1962
Master of Arts, Modern Languages
and Political Science, University of Lund
Professional
Experiences
1965-1968
Deputy International Secretary for
the Social Democratic Party
1968-71
International Secretary for the
Social Democratic Party
1971-1972
First Secretary, Ministry for
Foreign Affairs
1973-1976
Foreign Policy Advisor in the
Cabinet of Prime Minister Olof
Palme
1976-1982
International Secretary for the
Social Democratic Party
1982-1991
Permanent Under-Secretary of State,
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
1991-1994
Member of Parliament, Deputy
Chairman of the Committee on Foreign
Affairs and Spokesperson for the Social
Democratic Party on Foreign Affairs
1994-1996
Minister for International
Development Co-operation and Deputy
Foreign Minister for Co-operation with
Central and Eastern Europe, including
Russia and the Baltic States
1996-1999
Minister for International
Development Co-operation, Migration and
Asylum Policy and Deputy Foreign Minister
1999-2000
Member of European Parliament,
leader of the Swedish Social Democratic
Group and Spokesperson for the Socialist
Group on Foreign Affairs, President of the
Parliament ´s Committee for
relations with Japan
2000-2004
Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Sweden to the United
Nations 2004-
Distinguished Visiting Professor, Adelphi
University, New York
Other
Engagements and Commissions of Trust
1971-1973
Editor of “Tiden”, the
theoretical review of the Social
Democratic Party
1973-1979
Member of the Local School
Authority in Lidingö
1979-1982
Member of the Lidingö Cultural
Board
1987-1989
Member of the International
Commission for Central American Recovery
and Development (The Sanford Commission)
1989-1996
Chairperson of the National Judo
Federation, Black belt, 1st
Dan, 1990
1996-
Chairperson of the Olof Palme
Memorial Fund
2000
and 2002
Head of the European Union Election
Observation Mission in Zimbabwe
1999-2002
Chairperson of the Swedish
Institute in Alexandria, Egypt
2001- 2004
Chair, United Nations Committee for
Parliamentarians for
Global Action
2000-2004
Member of the Board of the
International Peace Academy, New York
Books
and Publications
Latin
Americans on Latin America, Stockholm,
1968
I
orkanens öga
(Central America -In the eye of the
Hurricane), Stockholm 1981
El
desafío europeo en Centroamérica,
San José, Costa Rica, 1982
Dokument
inifrån
(Between Blocks and Bridges: Swedish
Foreign Policy from Olof Palme to
Post-Communism), Stockholm, 1992
Entre
Escila y Caribdis: Olof Palme, la Guerra
Fría y el Poscomunismo, Mexico, 1994
Mellan
Maastricht och Sarajevo,
(Europe between Maastricht and
Sarajevo) Stockholm, 1994
The
Impossible Neutrality. Southern Africa,
Cape Town, 1994
Olof
Palme – Reformisten utan gränser
(Reformer without Borders), 1996
Olof Palme - Reformista sin Fronteras,
Barcelona 1997
Can
the United Nations manage the new era?
Stockholm, 1999
From
Marshall to Post-Communism: A New Deal for
Internationalism
First
lecture of the Marshall Plan 50th Anniversary Distinguished Lecture Series at the Smithsonian
Institution, Washington D.C., December 10,
1996
American
Hegemony in the International Perspective.
Lecture at the Summer Faculty Institute on
World Security Affairs, Amherst College,
June 11, 2002
Global
challenges in the 21st
century. Lecture at Adelphi
University, Garden City, October 2002
The
United Nations, Global Governance, and
Global Citizenship after September 11
Lecture
at Adelphi University, Garden City,
September 22, 2004
Languages
Swedish,
English, French, Spanish and some German.