IAN
WILLIAMS is available for Media
Interviews:
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
MaximsNews
Columnist
Ian
Williams

Ian Williams
is a journalist and U.N. Correspondent
for The Nation and a weekly
columnist for www.MaximsNews.com.
Ian Williams is the past
president of the United Nations
Correspondents Association. See
his Bio.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
Resign?
"Hell
No"
UNITED
NATIONS -- 7 April 2005 / www.MaximsNews.com
/ "Hell
No!" said Kofi Annan when asked
whether he would resign after the
Volcker Report effectively cleared him
of using any influence on behalf of
Cotecna, the company that had employed
his son Kojo.
It was good to see him in fighting
mode instead of the usual UN posture
of Job suffering assorted plagues,
conservatives and a rabid
ambassadorial nominee from the
White House trying his faith.
Even so, Hell hath no fury like an
American conservative cheated of his
prey, and not until Hell freezes over
will the right-wing media in the US
admit that Volcker's "there is no
evidence of wrongdoing" means
"not guilty," or
"innocent."
Apart
from turning the other cheek, the
other besetting sin of the UN is
assuming, at least in public, that
their interlocutors on the right of
American politics are susceptible to
rational arguments, evidence, and
similar foreign logical tropes.
Indeed,
many of his persecutors have already
insulated themselves from reality by
preemptively calling the Volcker
Inquiry a "whitewash," and
condemning the use of residual Oil For
Food funds to pay for it.
I
sympathize, but not for the same
reason as the shedders of crocodile
tears who complain that its costs
comes from funds that should have gone
to starving children in Iraq.
I
may lend them a handkerchief to dab at
their wet eyelids if I hear any of
them complain about:
o
the $30 billion or so that were
sequestrated in reparations from the
Oil For Food fund to pay compensation
for the first Gulf War,
o
the 5% of Iraqi oil revenue that is
still being deducted from all Iraqi
oil sales to pay compensation, mostly
to
Kuwait
, for reparations,
o
the $8 billion plus left over money
from the Oil For Food fund that was
handed over to the Coalition
Provisional Authority after the
invasion, and which the US
administration admits (quietly) has
never been accounted for properly, but
a lot of which we know ended up in
Halliburton's coffers on no bid
contracts.
However,
my handkerchiefs will stay dry and in
my pocket since to the best of my
knowledge not one of these critics has
raised a peep at this looting of the
Iraqi people's patrimony.
Sixty
million dollars budget, and the
Volcker panel has so far found that
Benon Sevan received $160,000 that he
cannot prove came from his deceased
Aunt, that Dileep Nair of the Office
of Internal Oversight Services, which
most UN insiders know makes the
Keystone Cops look professional, used
some $200,000 in Oil For Food funds to
pay for a compatriot he wanted to
employ, and that Kojo Annan earned
$200,000 more than he declared from
Cotecna.
And
of course that Iqbal Riza, Annan's
Secretary, let his secretary shred
three years of files. It is indeed an
amazing coincidence that his secretary
should make such a request just as the
Security Council was asking all
documents to be kept.
But
Riza was not a big fan of
transparency, and this would not be
the first time that his generation of
UN staff assumed that secrecy was the
best way to deal with media scrutiny
– even when there was nothing to
hide.
All
of these findings suggest
improprieties – but there is nothing
illegal about any of them, according
to Volcker and according to me, almost
nothing that justifies this egregious
waste of resources on an Inquiry whose
results so far have been like the FBI
handing Al Capone a parking ticket
after a two year stake out in
Chicago
.
On
the other hand, now comes the good bit
which promises to make the otherwise
wasted money well spent.
At
the press conference at which he
declared that there was no evidence
against Annan on the most substantial
allegations made so far, Volcker
promised that the final report in this
will deal with the broader issues of
the UN Oil For Food Programme, and the
involvement of the Sanctions
Committee, the Security Council and
the governments of the member states.
This
will be interesting.
On
the positive side, he may actually
point out that the Oil For Food
program which is now irredeemably
tainted as "inefficient" or
"corrupt" or
"scandal-ridden," was
actually so successful in its two
major aims- feeding Iraqis while
starving Saddam's war machine – that
the American invaders asked it
continue well into the occupation –
and could find no weapons of mass
destruction.
In
fact, allowing for the usual
inefficiencies of any international
bureaucracy, it was a very successful
program.
Back
in the
US
, Volcker will almost certainly report
that Republican and Democrat
administrations alike were complicit
in Iraqi oil trading with
Turkey
and
Jordan
.
(It
was trading, not smuggling, since the
Security Council, and the US Congress
knew about it, and condoned it.)
Almost
as his parting words former
US
Ambassador John Danforth had warned,
or threatened, the UN, not to try to
implicate his diplomatic colleagues.
However,
US bullying apart, the Sanctions
Committee was warned about Saddam
Hussein's double pricing and did
little about it, even though every
contract went to
Washington
and was minutely scrutinized by a
welter of committees there.
Each
year the
US
Secretary of State moved an
exemption for
Iraq
and
Turkey
to exempt them from American
repercussions for buying oil from
Iraq
– and the turkeys in Congress said
"Aye."
After
all these yelps from Americans
concerned about the UN accountability
and transparency, it will be really
interesting to see how much access the
Volcker Inquiry is allowed to have to
US government documents and
personnel to study this question.
This
would be a good opportunity for the UN
Secretariat to get some pay-back for
the way that those governments really
responsible for billions of dollars of
revenue going to Saddam have left
Annan and the UN swinging in the wind.
Sadly
the UN is still too polite to the
Number One Member State to really come
out swinging at it.
The
UN is temperamentally unsuited to
defending itself, as shown by its
volte-face over paying Benon Sevan's
legal bills.
Kofi
Annan's reply to the Commission on the
matter of whether or not he should
have held a deeper inquiry in 1999
when the first hint of Cotecna
employing his son was drafted by an
expensive firm of Washington lawyers,
Williams and Connolly.
Their
reply was quite convincing: Annan had
after all asked the advice of the
former head of Price Waterhouse,
Joseph Connor, the head of UN
management effectively nominated by
the US, and Hans Corell who was then
his USG for legal affairs and the then
head of OIOS for their advice, and
they told him not to bother.
I
hope that he did not have to pay from
his own pocket to defend himself for
carrying out his official duties.
It
is only fair that the same courtesy
should have been extended to Sevan,
who was after all being pursued
because of his official position as
head of the Oil For Food programme,
and who had been a chief target of the
witch-hunt from the beginning.
In
civilized countries, people are
presumed innocent until proven guilty,
and even those who are eventually
found guilty are allowed proper legal
representation.
The
Secretariat should have stuck its
ground.
The
SG has offered to lift diplomatic
immunity from anyone who is wanted for
prosecution.
Sevan
is in the
US
, where under the current climate of
opinion the prosecutors just have to
say "
Iraq" and the "United
Nations" often enough for a jury
to find the poor guy guilty of
masterminding September 11.
The
UN did the right thing by offering to
pay legal expenses for Sevan, and the
wrong thing by succumbing to a media
lynch mob and reneging on the deal.
We
can only hope that, heartened by the
Volcker verdict, they go on the
counter-attack and suggest that there
was another son of an influential
father, who used his paternal name to
cover his rear in numerous dicey
business undertakings, and who went on
to greater things.
Yes,
you really would expect more
forbearance from supporters of George
W. Bush, for Kojo's shenanigans.
However,
even the new invigorated Chef de
Cabinet, Mark Malloch Brown, although
he is more likely to post his personal
files on the press floor than shred
them, is unlikely to tweak the clown's
nose this way.
It's
up to us, the peoples, really, not to
let a bunch of faith-based
conservatives determine or divert the
agenda of a body that belongs to the
world, not La Verkin,
Utah
, the capital of flakey UN
haters. (www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/07/27/kooks/)
which currently seems
over-represented in the media and
Washington.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~