|
MaximsNews
Exclusive
MaximsNews
Columnist
Anora
Mahmudova

Tiananmen
Square 16 years ago this weekend.
"China firmly supports Uzbekistan's
moves to crack down on the "three evil forces" of terrorism,
separatism and extremism, and maintain domestic and regional stability
for peaceful development, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said in Beijing
Tuesday." The People's Daily

Uzbek special forces soldier

The Uzbek government insists that it was an attack by a small group of terrorists which resulted in the deaths of 173 people.
However, the eyewitness reports and unnamed army sources who spoke with BBC revealed that the number of killed may easily exceed 700 with many
more wounded.
Numerous eyewitnesses say that shootings lasted for hours with brief intervals and that soldiers shot at the wounded to
finish the job.

Uzbek Tiananmen Redux
Anora Mahmudova
was born in Ferghana, Uzbekistan, when it was
part of the Soviet Union.
She
studied at Ferghana and Tashkent State
Universities and won a scholarship to
study journalism at Pace University, New
York.
Anora
is the BBC World Central Asian Service
correspondent in the US and at the United
Nations.
She
has lectured on Central Asia at Paterson
University, New Jersey, Buffalo State
College and Almaty State University,
Kazakhstan.
She
has also appeared on VOA, RFERL, Pacifica
and has written for AlterNet,
OpenDemocracy, Tribune, Institute for War
and Peace Reporting, Middle East
International, Novoe Russkoe Slovo and
others.
Anora
Mahmudova is also a columnist for www.MaximsNews.com.
See:
Uzbekistan’s Growing Police State
AnoraMahmudova@MaximsNews.com
UNITED
NATIONS -
5 June 2005 www.MaximsNews.com
/ -- Sixteen years ago this weekend the Chinese Government gave its answer to the
thousands of young people who had been encouraged by the ripples of
democratization across the Communist World, and had poured into Tiananmen
Square to demand reform.
After weeks of negotiating with the demonstrators, the hardliners in the
government gained the upper hand, and sent some ten thousand heavily equipped troops to clear the square.
And they did.
Sweeping humans aside like litter after a street fair.
It has been sixteen years and until today no independent inquiry was conducted.
Countless people were thrown into jail and driven into exile, and the subject still remains a big taboo in the Chinese society: the one Chinese
leader Zhao Ziyang sympathetic to the demonstrators became a non-person, under
house arrest until his death this year.
The memory of Tiananmen square is, even after all this time, strong enough
for public opinion in democratic countries to prevent lifting all barriers
to trade to with China.
In contrast, this month the US is negotiating with the regime of Islam Karimov in neighboring Uzbekistan about prolonging the lease of its Khanabad
airbase and is continuing military aid to the government, where only three
weeks ago, in the southern city of Andijan the regime staged a replay of
Tiananmen Square all over again.
The Chinese government promptly gave an A plus to their pupils and expressed total support for the perpetrators of the
massacres.
Researching both events it is nauseating to see similarities both in the
origins of the events and their aftermath, right down to the 'damage control.'
Then and now, both regimes claim "foreign media" spread false news about the dead.
Very similarly, people ran out of patience with economic and political oppression.
The most reliable local reports suggest that it was triggered by
a smaller peaceful demonstration organized by relatives and friends of 23
people on trial accused of Islamic extremism.
After several days a group of angry men attacked a military base and a prison freeing thousands of
people after a court had sentenced men in secret to 20 plus years in prison.
Later, they occupied a city building and were joined by many
thousands of ordinary unarmed people who seized this first opportunity to
get their voices heard.
Just like their Chinese mentors, the Uzbek government used heavily armed
units including anti-terrorism units (which were reportedly trained by the
Americans with the American taxpayers' money) to shoot indiscriminately
at men, women, children.
The Uzbek government insists that it was an attack by a small group of terrorists which resulted in the deaths of 173 people.
However, the eyewitness reports and unnamed army sources who spoke with BBC revealed that the number of killed may easily exceed 700 with many
more wounded.
Numerous eyewitnesses say that shootings lasted for hours with brief intervals and that soldiers shot at the wounded to
finish the job.
The prolonged nature of the shooting suggests that it is more likely that
the order has been given at the highest level than that local troops had
momentarily lost their heads.
Something that the president Karimov denied, saying that "he never ordered to shoot at demonstrators" and shooting only
occurred while armed militants attacked the army.
Only days after the massacre president, Karimov flew to China on an official state visit to a 21 gun salute.
Beijing was quick to condemn "three evils forces of terrorisms, separatism and extremism" saying
that Beijing supports Uzbekistan's crackdown on these forces.
The People's Daily reversed reality with its report that 'Thousands of armed
protesters plunged the city of Andijan into chaos last Friday, releasing prisoners and clashing with security forces'.
See: http://english.people.com.cn/200505/25/eng20050525_186614.html
From the Chinese point of view, they want an Uzbek ruler
who could keep control over the so-called Islamic threat.
The Chinese would like to keep its overwhelmingly Muslim Uygur population in Western Xinjiang region
from ideas of independence.
Uzbekistan has a sizable minority of Uygurs inside the country but obligingly cracks down on Uygur activists who advocate the creation of
Eastern Turkestan.
And of course, they can hardly complain if one of their
neighbours follows in their own bloody footsteps.
But what does the US gain?
How is the 'War on Terror' helped by arming and training terrorists, for how else can you describe Karimov's killing of hundreds of
unarmed civilians?
It is all very well to supply arms and training to fight
terror, but when Karimov himself says that unarmed demonstrators are terrorists, he is telling us what those weapons will be used for!
In the long run, supporting a bloodthirsty dictator makes a mockery of all
the rhetoric about expanding democracy.
It will create more anti-American sentiment in the region and open way to Islamic fundamentalism, the very
evil President Bush claims to be fighting.
Karimov himself is unlikely to last sixteen years, but Washington owes it to the Uzbek people, and its
global credibility, not to become amnesiac about Andijan quite so quickly.
AnoraMahmudova@MaximsNews.com
Anora
Mahmudova's Columns in MaximsNews
Uzbek Tiananmen Redux
Uzbekistan’s
Growing Police State
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Unsubscribe: Unsubscribe@MaximsNews.com
ads@MaximsNews.com
Please
let us show you how we can send out your news, announce your
events and sell your books to over 10,000 at the United
Nations and the International Community, worldwide. Ads@MaximsNews.com
Diplomats,
donors, key United Nations Officials, U.N. activists,
all Missions to the U.N., all NGOs, journalists,
activists in human rights, women's rights, African-American
rights, peace, the environment, development and
poverty, public policy experts, political figures, and
academics.
MaximsNews
Network® LLC
Reaching Over 10,000 in the International Community, is
associated with MediaChannel.org
and Globalvision News Network, global news and media
information services with more than 300 news affiliates in 135
countries.
MaximsNews®LLC
is in partnership with the United Nations Foundation and the
Better World Fund.
MaximsNews
Institute is in
partnership with the World Policy Institute, New School University.
Syndicated
globally by RSS and XML
feeds, GOOGLE
NEWS, broadcast email, Blogs,
streaming video, Internet and news wire services. For Free
Subscription, RSS, or XML
feeds to your website, contact: MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com
Max
Stamper, Ph.D., London
School
of Economics, Publisher
DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com
Genevieve
Stamper, Vassar, Associate Publisher GenevieveStamper@MaximsNews.com
About
Max Stamper Key
Clients International
Affairs Media
Tools The
History of MaximsNews
Max
Stamper is
eager to explore your international public affairs and communication
needs, and to discuss our services. Phone: +1.201.848.6162
Suite
112, 76 North Maple Ave. , Ridgewood, NJ
07450 U.S.A.
MaximsNews
Network® LLC
The
views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of MaximsNews®
LLC
www.MaximsNews.com
MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com
© Copyrights 1999 - 2005, MaximsNews® LLC.
All rights reserved.
|