|
|

|
TOP
U.S. OFFICIAL AT UNESCO RESIGNS AMID
QUESTIONS OF FISCAL
IRREGULARITIES (MaximsNews.com,
U.N.) by Mehri Madarshahi |
|
|
The
audit report examined the improper use of procedures followed in retaining
consultants for the reform of the Education Sector.
Peter
Smith, the Assistant-Director-General for Education, joined the
Organization less than two years ago and shortly after the
U.S.
resumed
membership in UNESCO.
|
|
Before
assuming this position
he was the founding President of the
California
State
University
Monterey
Bay
campus and a one-time Republican Congressman
from
Vermont.
In
his letter of resignation to UNESCO's Director-General, Smith stated that on 9
February he had received "... a written threat against my life, received
through the mail at my home.
After
receiving the death threat, I can no longer tolerate the working environment at
UNESCO. For each of us, there is a
limit to what we will endure in the name of "doing the right thing. The
threat against my life, and the subsequent weak follow-up, has taken me past
that limit at UNESCO. The expiration of my first contract on June, 17th gives me
an opportunity to review my future service to UNESCO.”
His
current two-year contract with the Organization would have expired on 17 June
2007.
Last
Friday, 16 March, the Director-General sent a message to the UNESCO staff
stating that "Mr Peter Smith, Assistant Director-General for Education, has
tendered his resignation, which I have accepted, and which is effective
immediately. I wish to reiterate my full commitment to the aims of the Education
Sector strategic reform, which will continue. All necessary steps will be
taken to ensure that UNESCO achieves its goals in education”.
What
happened to proper checks and balances?
The
Audit report by Mr. Seguin will be presented to the
Executive Board at its upcoming session in April 2007 (see UNESCO document 176
EX/139), one of the governing bodies of the Organization.
The
report documents that Mr Smith had awarded …. contracts in less than a year,
with a total value of US$ 2.145 million – equivalent to 5.7% of the total
contractual services of the Organization for the biennium - to one particular
consulting firm, Navigant Consulting of
Chicago.
The
auditors faulted that in the process exceptional and dispensatory procedures
were used, avoiding proper process of competitive bidding and selection of
consultants. Fees were not negotiated and provisions of the Administrative
Manual of the Organization – designed to protect the Organization – had not
been respected.
According
to the financial regulations of UNESCO, such payments could only have been made
if there was a waiver issued by the Organization. Instead, payments were
structured in such a way that 4 of out of 8 contracts to Navigant, signed by Mr.
Smith, were issued in amounts below US$ 100,000, suggesting an effort to avoid
obtaining required waivers.
The
Auditors also indicated that they had not found any documented exchanges or
record of negotiation with the contractor as to the price and value of services
rendered or expected.
In
reacting to the findings by the Auditors, the ADG/ED noted that “the
fractioning of the contracts into four, each under 100,000, was not intended to
bypass the Contracts Committee but it was rather to enable the rules of UNESCO.
He added that the Contracts Committee, therefore, was not consulted as
the threshold of $100,000 had not been reached”.
The
auditors noted that waivers for proper procedures of bidding for the same vendor
were supposed to be granted only once every 12 month and under condition of
non-repeat of contract. Furthermore, it was stipulated in the rules that
recourse to outside expertise must be temporary.
Should
the unavailable expert knowledge become “permanently necessary, the sector is
required either to establish a temporary post or recruit someone to fill an
existing post”.
The
audit report asserts that, once the competent officers in the Executive Office
of the Education Sector had drawn Mr Smith’s attention to the procedural
requirements, he removed the authority from the Administrative Officer concerned
and transferred him. Mr. Smith subsequently sought the approval of the Contracts
Committee for amounts exceeding the limit of US$ 100,000, including contracts in
an amount of US$ 800,000, $400,000 and $549,955.
The
minutes of the Contracts Committee show that at points some members refused to
sign the minutes of the meeting for lack of transparency of the competitive
bidding and backed up their refusal with a memo to the ADG/Administration a.i.
(at the time the Deputy Director–General).
Nevertheless,
other members of the Contracts Committee chose to conduct a pro-forma evaluation
and moved to approve the contracts. In their accompanying letter, “they
regretted that the Education Sector has not paid adequate attention to the
established procedures”. The
objections of the Legal Advisor in particular were then overridden by the
affirmative decision of the Deputy Director-General.
The
audit report also points out that five contracts concluded between June and
December 2005 were financed from the regular budget of the Education Sector,
although these expenditures had not been envisaged in the Organization’s
regular budget for this period. The Audit report further casts doubt on whether
any authorization had been obtained for the sixth contract worth $400,000.
Further
investigation revealed, however, that the contract was originally valued at
US$1.2 million. ADG/ED had split the
contract into two segments of US $400,000 and US $800,000.
This was done in order to indicate that the 800,000 charge represented a
discounted rate, far below that of KPMG, BCG and other competitors.
The report also found that the payment claims were signed by the
Assistant Director-General of the Education Sector instead of the contracting
firm, i.e., Navigant Consulting.
The
audit report concludes that Mr Smith had retained Navigant Consulting on a
“preferential basis” without required scrutiny of its background, relevant
experience or areas of competence. According
to its website, Navigant was specializing in legal counseling, dispute, military
technology, litigation, healthcare and energy areas – with scant reference to
the educational exigencies of the Organization.
The
Executive Board had requested the Director-General to ”develop a management
framework for a decentralized and results-oriented education program reflecting
UNESCO’s specific contributions, especially in capacity-building for Member
States, institutes and field offices at the international, regional and country
levels”. Furthermore, it had
encouraged the Director-General “to consider appropriate organizational
changes which may be necessary in order to implement the above mentioned
management framework”.
Following
the recent adoption by UNESCO and its four co-convening “Education For All”
partners (UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and the World Bank), which was supported by the
G-8 at its
St. Petersburg
summit, UNESCO had moved to assume a leadership role in coordinating the global
education for all movement particularly at the country level.
It
remains to be seen how this most recent upheaval will impact the ability of the
Organization to deliver and to dispel questions that might arise at a time when
the Organization’s governing bodies are called to decide about the UNESCO’s
budget for 2008-2009.
by
Mehri Madarshahi,
MaximsNews
Paris Correspondence.
~~~~~
MaximsNews.com, An Independent Voice from the
U.N., provides commentary and analysis from
leading world figures: King Abdullah II
(Jordan), HRH Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein
(Jordan), Sir Brian Urquhart, Hans Blix, Amb.
Richard Holbrooke, Anwar Ibrahim, Bianca Jagger,
Dr. Nafis Sadik, Shashi Tharoor, Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, Noeleen Heyzer, Kerry
Kennedy, Ian Williams, Stephen Schlesinger, Sen.
Timothy E. Wirth, Marc Morial, Amb. Jayantha
Dhanapala (Sri Lanka), Amb. Pierre Schori
(Sweden), Amb. William H. Luers, Susan Roosevelt
Weld, Rory Kennedy, Mehri
Madarshahi, J. Michael Adams, Gloria Feldt,
Jeffrey Laurenti, Rodney D. Smith, Rory
O'Connor, Genevieve Stamper, Max Stamper and
others.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MaximsNews Network® LLC is a Global News Network reaching over 30,000 in the International Community. It is associated with MediaChannel.org and Globalvision News Network, global news and media information services with more than 350 news affiliates in 135 countries.
MaximsNews®LLC is in partnership with the United Nations Foundation and the Better World Fund.
Established in 1999.
The views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of MaximsNews®
LLC.
MaximsNews.com
U.N. ® LLC News for the United Nations and the International Community -
| www.MaximsNews.com
| MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com |
Please
contact us about Republishing:
Syndication@MaximsNews.com ©Copyrights 1999 - 2007, MaximsNews® LLC. All rights
reserved.
To
Unsubscribe: Unsubscribe@MaximsNews.com
|