UNITED NATIONS - / www.MaximsNews.com, UN/ - 21 June 2006 - The political theater in the U.S. Congress last week over the war just met a reality check when Japan announced that it is withdrawing its small troop contingent from Iraq.

The scripted and superficial deliberations in a bitterly polarized Congress not only bear scant resemblance to the grand, anguished Senate debates over Vietnam four decades ago; they seem markedly detached from the facts on the ground.

Still, policy is made. The House of Representatives has at last exercised its constitutional war power to declare the objective of war in Iraq: “to create a sovereign, free, secure, and united Iraq.” And it warns the American people they must brace themselves for “a long and demanding struggle.”

ADVERTISE on MaximsNews   REACH THE WORLD'S MOST INFLUENTIAL PEOPLE ADVERTISE on THIS SITE

The mission the Congress had authorized in 2002 was simply to enforce U.N. Security Council mandates for Iraq’s disarmament and defend the United States against the “continuing threat posed by Iraq.” 

Iraq was disarmed—long before the American invasion, it turns out—and Saddam Hussein’s “continuing threat” proved empty. But a triumphant administration could not resist mission creep—indeed, mission leap.

Now, by a vote of 256 to 153, Congress has boldly committed us to a long-term war in pursuit of a noble vision that traditional realists of both parties have dismissed as unaffordable and unattainable. 

Yet at this very moment, each benchmark for victory looks increasingly elusive.

At the moment, Iraq is not sovereign—the fact that a foreign leader can surprise Iraq’s prime minister by dropping in unannounced, as President Bush did last week, shows where sovereign power lies.

The freedom Iraqis most prize amid escalating violence is flight to other countries: Iraq was the world’s largest exporter of refugees in the past year, with 644,000 Iraqis seeking refuge in Syria and Jordan alone.

With monthly killings up 50 percent in the past year, insurgent attacks up 28 percent, incidents of sectarian violence up twelve-fold, Iraq is not yet becoming more secure.

And Iraqi unity remains elusive, as continued Sunni resistance and bitter political infighting underscore.

The president’s ambassador in Baghdad this month cabled to Washington depressing accounts of intensifying Islamist intimidation. 

The United States, he reported, “is widely perceived as fully controlling the country and tolerating the malaise”; middle class circles “increasingly disapprove of the coalition presence”; “the central government, our [Iraqi] staff says, is not relevant”; and the embassy’s Iraqi staffers “ask what provisions we would make for them if we evacuate.”

Disdaining such concerns as defeatism, the House Republican leadership described their expansive Iraq mission as integral to the “global war on terror.” 

The war’s supporters declared they would set no “arbitrary” date for withdrawal from Iraq, and called on other nations to join the U.S. coalition.

That coalition, however, is unraveling. Japan is rushing to follow Italy out the door, and Korea and even Britain are edging toward the exit.

The very link House leaders make between Iraq and counterterrorism is in fact what undermines the struggle against terrorism around the world. 

New Pew polling data show international support for the war on terror plummets the longer the fighting in Iraq goes on—falling by two-thirds in Spain and Japan in just a year. 

Two-thirds of Britons say the Iraq war has made the world more dangerous rather than safer.

As a result, the United States faces the growing rage in the Muslim world in ever starker isolation. 

Oddly, senior policymakers seem to revel in that isolation, especially at the United Nations. 

They still gamble on a turn-around in Iraq that vindicates them and proves the rest of the world wrong—particularly the war’s opponents at home.

The public’s disenchantment with the war—54 percent say the invasion was a mistake; 53 percent favor a timeline for withdrawal; 60 percent believe Iraq will make us more reluctant to use force overseas—finds oddly little traction in Congress. 

With few defections, Republicans in Congress have remained admirably united behind the President’s war. Democrats mostly oppose the current course, but are divided on the alternative.

The few Iraqi liberals still looking to America for lessons in democracy will despairingly conclude from the past week’s political maneuvering that, for all sides in Washington, the Iraq debate has little to do with what’s best for Iraq—and everything to do with what’s best for politicians in Washington. 

Even a conference committee’s secretive deletion of a provision barring funds to build permanent U.S. military bases, which House and Senate had both approved, offers them a discouraging lesson in the art of muffled political accountability on a concern of burning importance to Iraqis.

Still, beyond the current political jockeying, Americans are groping their way toward a profound decision. 

The direction of America’s role in the world after 2008 will turn fatefully on whether Americans conclude that unilateral military assertiveness is a successful strategy—or so disastrous that America must re-embrace the United Nations and international law as the strategic bulwark of the global order.

        JeffreyLaurenti@MaximsNews.com

MaximsNews Columns by Jeffrey Laurenti

IRAQ, CONGRESS, and PUBLIC DISENCHANTMENT

IRAN: CARROTS AND STICKS!!!

Avoiding Defeat on Human Rights

Congressman John Murtha on Iraq War    

A Security Council Numbers Game: All Bets Off

Bolton: A New UN Phenomenon

         Jeffrey Laurenti is a senior fellow in international affairs at The Century Foundation.  He is an expert in international security, international law and multilateral institutions. 

He is the author of numerous monographs on international peace and security, terrorism, U.N. reform, and international narcotics policy. He has authored articles for The Christian Science Monitor, The Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, New York Newsday, and the Los Angeles Times, and international policy journals. 

As a senior advisor to the United Nations Foundation, Laurenti has served as deputy director of the United Nations and Global Security initiative the foundation established, with backing from The Century Foundation, to support the debate on international security of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change commissioned by the United Nations Secretary-General. 

Laurenti was executive director of policy studies at the United Nations Association of the United States until 2003, currently serves on the Association’s Board of Directors, and also is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. 

He was candidate for the US House of Representatives in 1986, senior issues advisor to the Mondale/Ferraro campaign and from 1978 to 1984, was Executive Director of the New Jersey Senate. Previously, he was a program officer for The Century Foundation, then the Twentieth Century Fund.  

Jeffrey Laurenti is a Contributor to MaximsNews.com.  

MaximsNews Network® LLC is a Global News Network reaching over 30,000 in the International Community. It is associated with MediaChannel.org and Globalvision News Network, global news and media information services with more than 350 news affiliates in 135 countries. MaximsNews®LLC is in partnership with the United Nations Foundation and the Better World Fund. MaximsNews Institute is in partnership with the World Policy Institute, New School University.

Max Stamper, Ph.D., London School of Economics, Publisher & Editor-in-Chief MaximsNews Network, former United Nations Official, U.N. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com

Genevieve Stamper, Associate Publisher, GenevieveStamper@MaximsNews.com

Front Page  | About Max Stamper | Key Clients | International Affairs | Your Savvy Guide for Dealing with Journalists | The History of MaximsNews

Max Stamper is eager to explore your international public affairs and communication needs, and to discuss our services. Phone: +1.201.848.6162, Suite 112, 76 North Maple Ave., Ridgewood, NJ  07450 U.S.A., The views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of MaximsNews® LLC, www.MaximsNews.com MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com
© Copyrights 1999 - 2006, MaximsNews® LLC. All rights reserved.