|
|
|

The
Nation Independent
Journalism Since 1865
The Nation was founded in
the United States by
slavery abolitionists in
1865 and our magazine has
remained true to its
original commitment to be
the critical, independent
voice in American
journalism.
James Baldwin, Ralph Nader
and Hunter Thompson
published their first
pieces in The Nation.
Other contributors have
included Martin Luther
King Jr., Albert Einstein,
Eleanor Roosevelt, Emma
Goldman and Jean-Paul
Sartre.
The Nation has a proud
literary history as well,
having published the work
of W.H. Auden, Langston
Hughes, Sylvia Plath,
Henry James, Willa Cather,
Thomas Mann and hundreds
of other major writers.
MaximsNews Readers may
have four trial issues at
our expense, then a total
of 24 issues for only
$13.95. Click
here to subscribe through
MaximsNews. |
|
|
|
Free!!
Free!! Free!!
Available
for Media Interviews: IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
|
The
MaximsNews Global Pundit
Ian Williams

Skeptic Ian Williams questions
an earlier U.S. president.
He is an
international journalist and the past
president of the United Nations
Correspondents Association. This article
was published with permission from The
Nation. See his Blog: DeadlinePundit.
|
BUSH
at UN: SELECTIVE REALITY by IAN WILLIAMS (MaximsNews.com,
U.N.)
|
UNITED NATIONS - / www.MaximsNews.com
UN/ - 20 September 2006 --
Just before he
spoke
today to the United Nations General Assembly,
George W. Bush sent a discreet message to both
the United Nations and the US Congress by
quietly withholding payments, for the fifth
consecutive year, to the United Nations Fund for
Population Activities.
The
health of hundreds of thousands of women and
children will be impaired--and many lives
lost--as a result of his pandering to the most
prejudiced elements of his conservative
constituency.
Missing from
this year's speech was some of the snide
innuendo and challenge of Bush's previous
comments on the United Nations, perhaps
reflecting some injection of reality into his
unilateral worldview.
This time
around, the President also refrained from making
ultimatums to the assembled delegations
threatening action if they did not go along with
his Administration's ideas of what was good for
them.
Bush's
message was mainly addressed to the ostensible
silent majority of moderates in the
Middle East. But his words were as cushioned
from the cruelty of the real world as one would
expect from an Administration that is making Panglossianism
a state religion.
Up to a
point, the President was in harmony with
Secretary General Kofi Annan's address to the
General Assembly, in that both dwelt on the
Middle East.
But while
Annan identified the core of many of the
problems in the Middle East, Bush's simplistic
assessment of "the bright future in the
broader
Middle East
" was such a caricature as to leave some
listeners chuckling.
Neither the
elections in
Egypt, nor the municipal elections in
Saudi Arabia
that he trumpeted, offer any conclusive evidence
of the march of democracy.
"Some
have argued that the democratic changes we're
seeing in the
Middle East
are destabilizing the region. This argument
rests on a false assumption, that the
Middle East
was stable to begin with," he said.
In fact, his
argument is against himself: Most of his critics
will adduce that the actual and threatened
military intervention of the
United States
and
Israel
are not infusions of democracy but destabilizing
forces in and of themselves.
But
Annan had a firmer grip on the truth in his
address to the Assembly that preceded the
President's.
"As
long as the Security Council is unable to end
this [Israeli-Palestinian] conflict, and the now
nearly forty-year-old occupation, by bringing
both sides to accept and implement its
resolutions, so long will our impartiality be
questioned," he said.
"So
long will our best efforts to resolve other
conflicts be resisted, including those in
Iraq
and
Afghanistan."
Bush's
invocation of the envoys of
Iraq
and
Afghanistan
seated in the General Assembly as representing
elected governments, compared to when he spoke
five years ago, may be accurate. But he was
silent on the powerlessness of those governments
to actually govern.
The Lebanese
in particular are unlikely to recognize his
depiction of their "homes and
communities...caught in the crossfire"--in
light of the Bush-supported blitz that was
actually mounted against their country.
"We see
your suffering," the President said, but he
failed to explain why he did nothing to stop it
for a long month of bombing and shelling from
Israel.
His remarks
on
Iran
were also remarkable for a selective view of
reality. "
Iran
must abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.
Despite what the regime tells you, we have no
objection to
Iran
's pursuit of a truly peaceful nuclear power
program. We're working toward a diplomatic
solution to this crisis," Bush noted,
without explaining why the UN's nuclear watchdog
last week reprimanded
the Administration for gross exaggeration of the
very slender evidence of an actual weapons
program.
(After the
speech, Bush was spared close confrontation with
reality in the form of Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad because the latter skipped the heads
of state lunch, since wine was being served
there. Reformed imbiber Bush suffered in
silence.)
The one
redeeming aspect of Bush's cartoonish tour of
the
Middle East
was that he lowered the "terrorist"
word count and more often replaced it by his
latest buzzword, "extremism." But if
this speech was addressed to the people of the
region, it is certainly one of the most inept
ever.
His
invocation of a Palestinian state that has
"territorial integrity" raises many
questions, not least concerning his previous
green light for Israeli annexation of settlement
blocs and acquiescence in building the
wall.
Although
some UN observers looked hopefully for signs of
a realization that economic sanctions against
the democratically elected Palestinian Authority
has been counterproductive, they were not, in
fact, very visible.
Hanan
Ashrawi, mentioned as possible foreign minister
of a new coalition Palestinian Authority,
criticized Bush's "very simplified view of
the
Middle East."
Ashrawi
summed up the American President's speech,
describing it as "more of the same. It
contained no concrete proposals to deal with
crucial issues, the boundaries, the
settlement.... Right now Kofi is speaking out on
the issues. I wish he had done it earlier."
"A
broken record," was the similar description
from one UN official. In fact, Annan, in yet
another oblique, nuanced and hence unrecognized
critique of the Bush Administration, identified
another very tangible reason why the President's
invocations of democracy may generate so much
skepticism at the UN.
"Even
the necessary and legitimate struggle around the
world against terrorism is used as a pretext to
abridge or abrogate fundamental human rights,
thereby ceding moral ground to the terrorists
and helping them find new recruits," Annan
said.
Bush was on
firmer ground on Darfur, announcing the
appointment of former USAID administrator Andrew
Natsios as presidential special envoy to
Sudan, "to lead
America
's efforts to resolve the outstanding disputes
and help bring peace to your land."
But he
pinned the strategy on the UN peacekeeping
troops going in, warning, "If the Sudanese
government does not approve this peacekeeping
force quickly, the United Nations must
act."
It
will be interesting to see what size of stick
Natsios is issued for his negotiations, or what
form of diplomacy the White House can use to
persuade
China
to go along with a more robust UN
involvement.
And
if one were cynical, one would wonder whether
the interest in Darfur would outlast Bush's need
to mobilize conservative Christians, for whom
Darfur
is a defining issue, to vote for Republican
candidates in the midterm elections.
IanWilliams@MaximsNews.com
~~~~~~
MaximsNews.com,
An Independent Voice from the U.N., provides
commentary and analysis from leading world
figures: King Abdullah II (Jordan), HRH
Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein (Jordan), Sir Brian
Urquhart, Hans Blix, Amb. Richard Holbrooke,
Anwar Ibrahim, Bianca Jagger, Shashi Tharoor,
Kerry Kennedy, Ian Williams, Stephen
Schlesinger, Sen. Timothy E. Wirth, Marc Morial,
Barbara Crossette, Amb.
Jayantha Dhanapala (Sri Lanka), Amb. Pierre Schori (Sweden),
Amb. William H. Luers, Mehri Madarshahi, Gloria
Feldt, Jeffrey Laurenti, Rodney D. Smith, Rory
O'Connor, Genevieve Stamper, Max Stamper and
others.
|
MaximsNews Network® LLC is a Global News Network reaching over 30,000 in the International Community. It is associated with MediaChannel.org and Globalvision News Network, global news and media information services with more than 350 news affiliates in 135 countries.
MaximsNews®LLC is in partnership with the United Nations Foundation and the Better World Fund.
Max Stamper, Ph.D., London School of
Economics, Publisher &
Editor-in-Chief
MaximsNews Network, former United
Nations Official, U.N.
Population Division,
Department of Economic
and Social Affairs. DrMaxStamper@MaximsNews.com
Genevieve Stamper, Associate Publisher, GenevieveStamper@MaximsNews.com
Front Page
| About Max Stamper | Key Clients | International Affairs |
Your
Savvy Guide for Dealing
with Journalists | The History of MaximsNews
Max Stamper is eager to explore your international public affairs and communication needs, and to discuss our services. Phone: +1.201.848.6162,
Suite 112, 76 North Maple Ave., Ridgewood, NJ 07450 U.S.A.,
The views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of MaximsNews® LLC,
www.MaximsNews.com MaximsNews@MaximsNews.com
© Copyrights 1999 - 2006, MaximsNews® LLC. All rights
reserved.
To
Unsubscribe: Unsubscribe@MaximsNews.com
|
|
|